matplotlib-devel Mailing List for matplotlib (Page 10)

On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 23:25:12 +0100, Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote:
> Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the tarball the data
> files needed to run the examples without internet connection. I
> thought it was decided to ship them directly in the tarball and so use
> the examples.directory rc option to point to them at build-time and
> avoid to download, but if they're not in the tarball.... :)
> 
You might consider looking at my Ubuntu PPA[1] if you are going to work on
packaging. I seem to have everything working at this point, so perhaps
that can save you some work.
Cheers,
- Ben
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bgamari/+archive/matplotlib-unofficial

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 23:50, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote:
> I just added a sample data release file to the same dir --
> mpl_sampledata-1.0.1rc.tar.gz - different tarball, but should contain
> everything you need. Will this meet Debian's requirements? We could add it
> to the main tarball, but part of the original impetus in moving the data out
> of the main tree was to make the main tarball smaller. I can go either way
> if it is a major hassle for you guys to do it differently.
Thanks for the fast reply! There is a quite-new feature that allows
use to use several tarballs to create a single source package (in this
case the source & sample_data tarballs to generate the matplotlib
debian source package): I can try that, and I'll let you know if I
fail or not.
Cheers,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote:
>
> >
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/
>
>
> Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the tarball the data
> files needed to run the examples without internet connection. I
> thought it was decided to ship them directly in the tarball and so use
> the examples.directory rc option to point to them at build-time and
> avoid to download, but if they're not in the tarball.... :)
>
>
I just added a sample data release file to the same dir --
mpl_sampledata-1.0.1rc.tar.gz
- different tarball, but should contain everything you need. Will this meet
Debian's requirements? We could add it to the main tarball, but part of the
original impetus in moving the data out of the main tree was to make the
main tarball smaller. I can go either way if it is a major hassle for you
guys to do it differently.
JDH

Hi John,
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:52, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote:
> We are long overdue on getting a bugfix release of 1.0.0 out, so I have
> uploaded an rc for testing at
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/
Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the tarball the data
files needed to run the examples without internet connection. I
thought it was decided to ship them directly in the tarball and so use
the examples.directory rc option to point to them at build-time and
avoid to download, but if they're not in the tarball.... :)
Cheers,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

We are long overdue on getting a bugfix release of 1.0.0 out, so I have
uploaded an rc for testing at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/
Christoph and Russell -- if you have time could you build win32 and OSX
binaries for testing as well. I don't believe either of you have developer
permissions to upload directly to this site, but I would be happy to add you
if you send me an sf id. Alternatively, you can upload them to a site of
your choosing and I'll upload them for you (drop.io was acquired by facebook
and no longer works).
There are a number of bugs and patches on the tracker that it would have
been nice to tackle before this release, but there have been enough
improvements in the branch that delaying at this point would be a case of
the perfect being the enemy of the good so I think we should move forward
now. Nonetheless, if there are important bugs or patches that anyone can
tackle before we cut the final release, that would be great.
In sf, we used to be able to tag a file as the preferred file for a given
OS, but in the new file manager interface I no longer see a way to do this,
so that for example the rc files don't show up as the default download
options. Does anyone know how to do this, or perhaps someone can suggest a
drop.io replacement that supports multiple user uploaders (eg the different
binary builders) and public, no-registration downloads. I googled a bit and
didn't find anything that fit the bill.
JDH

On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:32:16 -0600, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote:
> Sorry for the repeated delays. I have been out of the country (scipy india)
> and then catching up and Christmas and New Years... I will try and block
> out some time tomorrow for an rc...
> 
Awesome. Thanks!
- Ben

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Ben Gamari <bga...@gm...> wrote:
> On 2010年12月18日 06:41:43 -0500, Ben Gamari <bg...@gm...> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Can we please have a 1.0.1 release? It would be really nice to finally
> > have official 1.0 packages for ubuntu/debian.
> >
> Pretty please with sugar on top?
>
>
Sorry for the repeated delays. I have been out of the country (scipy india)
and then catching up and Christmas and New Years... I will try and block
out some time tomorrow for an rc...
JDH

On 2010年12月18日 06:41:43 -0500, Ben Gamari <bg...@gm...> wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> Can we please have a 1.0.1 release? It would be really nice to finally
> have official 1.0 packages for ubuntu/debian.
> 
Pretty please with sugar on top?
Cheers,
- Ben