You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
(3) |
7
|
8
(2) |
9
|
10
(1) |
11
|
12
|
13
(6) |
14
(11) |
15
(2) |
16
(3) |
17
(3) |
18
(1) |
19
(1) |
20
(1) |
21
(2) |
22
(1) |
23
(1) |
24
(3) |
25
|
26
|
27
(6) |
28
(4) |
29
(5) |
30
|
31
(2) |
|
This looks quite good to me. I'd like some feedback from Thomas Caswell, who's looked at this part of the code much more than I have lately, but assuming he's ok, you have my go ahead to start the implementation. Cheers, Mike On 01/08/2014 10:55 AM, Federico Ariza wrote: > Hello everybody. > > I just created a new > MEPhttps://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep22 that is open > for discussion and destruction. > > Background: > > In my way to get a MultiFigureManager PR > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2465 we came to the > conclusion that the work has to be splitted in smaller PRs. > > One of the goals of my PR was to "Be able to easily modify the toolbar > adding and removing toolitems." This mostly breakes the existing > infrastructure of Toolbar. > > Working on a smaller PR https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2557 > to address this point, it became clear that a more radical change was > needed to have a clean interface for "User Interaction tools" > > To make it easier to discuss, I created the MEP22 proposing a > separation of powers (insert political joke here). It is open to all > kind of modifications so don't be shy. > > As reference, there are a couple of previous PRs relating to this > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1849 and > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2557 > Both of these don't address the problem of reconfiguration > > Thank you > Federico > -- _ |\/|o _|_ _. _ | | \.__ __|__|_|_ _ _ ._ _ | ||(_| |(_|(/_| |_/|(_)(/_|_ |_|_)(_)(_)| | | http://www.droettboom.com
Hello everybody Is anybody going to pycon 2014 in Montreal. Is there a sprint planned for that conference? Thanks Federico -- Y yo que culpa tengo de que ellas se crean todo lo que yo les digo? -- Antonio Alducin --
Hello everybody. I just created a new MEPhttps://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep22 that is open for discussion and destruction. Background: In my way to get a MultiFigureManager PR https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2465 we came to the conclusion that the work has to be splitted in smaller PRs. One of the goals of my PR was to "Be able to easily modify the toolbar adding and removing toolitems." This mostly breakes the existing infrastructure of Toolbar. Working on a smaller PR https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2557 to address this point, it became clear that a more radical change was needed to have a clean interface for "User Interaction tools" To make it easier to discuss, I created the MEP22 proposing a separation of powers (insert political joke here). It is open to all kind of modifications so don't be shy. As reference, there are a couple of previous PRs relating to this https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1849 and https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2557 Both of these don't address the problem of reconfiguration Thank you Federico -- Y yo que culpa tengo de que ellas se crean todo lo que yo les digo? -- Antonio Alducin --
Hi, On the main doc page http://matplotlib.org/contents.html the "Examples" section is misaligned (because it gets surrounded by a blockquote tag). I guess it relates to the special treatment it gets in content.rst (https://raw2.github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/master/doc/contents.rst). I don't know what magic is required to put it right (I always make alignment errors myself with Sphinx...). Maybe just add or remove one space ? best, Pierre (beyond this alignment issue, I feel like this small Examples link is a bit lost. It may deserve a stronger visual presence)
On the calendar, I had marked some time ago to mark a 1.4.0rc1 this Wednesday. Due to an illness that's been making its way around my family, I don't think that's going to happen. However, I think we can start the "triage" of issues that would be nice to fix for 1.4.0. We already have 45 issues tagged as 1.4.x -- it might be helpful to start going through them and see what looks reasonable to resolve, find any that are critical etc. Anything that's a serious regression from 1.3.x should be marked as 1.4.x blocker. We should also look at the 1.3.x issues. I see a lot of activity around this is already underway, I'll hopefully have some time to do some of this this week. Then we'll have a better sense of what needs to get done for a 1.4.0rc1. Happy New Year, Mike -- _ |\/|o _|_ _. _ | | \.__ __|__|_|_ _ _ ._ _ | ||(_| |(_|(/_| |_/|(_)(/_|_ |_|_)(_)(_)| | | http://www.droettboom.com
Go ahead and create a new MEP -- announce it here when it's ready for review. Thanks! Mike On 01/06/2014 10:38 AM, Federico Ariza wrote: > Hello everybody > > In discussions with @tacaswell regarding the PR > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2624 we talked about the > possibility to make a new MEP for the restructuring of the toolbar, > splitting navigation-toolbar and some more stuff. > > My question is, > Do I just go ahead and create a new MEP based on the template? or > is there a protocol for new MEP creation? > > Thanks and happy new year > Federico > -- _ |\/|o _|_ _. _ | | \.__ __|__|_|_ _ _ ._ _ | ||(_| |(_|(/_| |_/|(_)(/_|_ |_|_)(_)(_)| | | http://www.droettboom.com
Hello everybody In discussions with @tacaswell regarding the PR https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2624 we talked about the possibility to make a new MEP for the restructuring of the toolbar, splitting navigation-toolbar and some more stuff. My question is, Do I just go ahead and create a new MEP based on the template? or is there a protocol for new MEP creation? Thanks and happy new year Federico -- Y yo que culpa tengo de que ellas se crean todo lo que yo les digo? -- Antonio Alducin --