Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Wikimedia Conference 2018/Documentation/Movement Strategy track/Annexes

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
WMCON 2018 Core Conference Program Fringe Events Registration & Participants
Location
Logistics
Contact
Documentation,
Reports, Reviews

A . Working Groups: Input Documents

[edit ]

These are the input documents created by the working groups that were formed during the Wikimedia Conference. For future working groups, these documents may serve as information material.

B . Micro-inputs on Possibilities

[edit ]

These micro-inputs from participants were further clustered into higher level statements, as outlined in Session 2 - The Possibilities, "Emerging Possibilities".

Possibility elements

[edit ]
A. Economical resources are accessible within the movement
  • No funding problems ever!
  • Resources meeting our ambitions
    • Resources meeting our ambitions
  • Economical resources are accessible to everyone
  • 10-20% of project funding to Africa (in proportion to the population)
    • At least 10-20% of project funding to Africa
  • Effective support in Wikimedia Movement
    • Wikimedia organisation (increasing each other’s building) capacity with mentoring programs and knowledge sharing - Developing centre for expertise and excellence
    • Funding that allows affiliates to plan strategically
    • Effective support for chapter and use groups
B. More diverse and global content
  • Closing the content gap
    • Simple language not only in English
    • We should be on good way to closing the content gap
    • Historical record is preserved but while preserving privacy. figure out balance.
  • More content in marginalised languages
  • More volume of knowledge
    • No content gaps in projects + high quality (gender perspective)
    • A new and evolved understanding of what a reliable source is, taking into accounts: people who have been left out; the threat of misinformation and manipulation
    • Incourage new languages (better incubator interface)
    • High quality articles on the 500 most requested topics in every important language
  • Readers find and can access information that they care about
    • More focus on the needs of consumer of our contents
    • A Mobile-first wikipedia
    • Free knowledge is accessible, interconnected and easy to reuse
    • Wikipedia landing pages feature locally relevant content - based on their location
  • Eliminate geographical gaps
    • In 5 years we have increased access to free knowledge in Africa & communities which are remote by 20%
    • No Geo gap
    • Wider geographical coverage
  • Bridge the knowledge gaps
    • Intangible knowledge should be as available and correctly communicated as classical encyclopedic knowledge
    • Better balance in gender related articles
  • Possibility to find content in your own language
    • In 5 years I would like to see more intralingual projects working on content in all languages
    • Translation is the future of wikipedia
    • People will search in their local language, and find relevant content in their language (on wiki).
  • New forms of understanding information
    • We are accessible in new and different ways - actively disseminating free knowledge
    • Significant growth in audio and video
  • Knowledge equity includes ORAL knowledge
    • Platform for oral heritage
    • Room for ideas to GROW
    • We provide free knowledge in new formats and new dimensions
  • Integrated oral and local knowledge (on current major projects)
    • In 5 years I want 10 more projects launched to integrate oral knowledge in a contents
    • Engage with indigenous communities in order to further our mission
  • Notability and reliability account for locally relevant content
    • Standards such as notability and reliable sources are flexible to accommodate creation of locally relevant content.
  • Reliable + reusable content
  • Every consumer will find quality information
    • All languages (>I m:ll users) should have a quality Wikipedia
    • Quality is consistent across topics and there is good coverage of all topics
C. Accessibility and case of use (technology)
  • Better infrastructure to access Wikimedia
    • Better infrastructure for access to information
  • Experiments with new formats of existing knowledge (complexity, visual VS audio/textual)
    • Future vision [2-3 yy]: have versions of article on a topic: -> by audience + structuring of knowledge, secondary by language [pure translation]. Rather than by language [not even rough translation]; ->we now have new tool to maintain translations -> make this central
    • Knowledge is accessible to people who do not read or write
    • Our project have multimedia content for people who learn in different ways
    • Have space to experiment with different models of knowledge
  • Use of up-to-date technology
    • Ready for all new technology, media when it appears in editing interfaces + reading
    • Usage of Virtual Reality for search contents
    • Different media in our projects
  • A technology platform to support more forms of knowledge, in more formats
    • Open to new forms of knowledge, rsp oral tradition
    • Tech development (AI, videos, etc)
    • For people who read: where knowledge exists "elsewhere" it can travel to others who need it
    • New WikiM project
  • Wikimedia is providing better technological solutions for access to knowledge
  • Broad, reliable offline access
  • Intuitive presentation + compartmentalized knowledge
    • Knowledge is compartmentalised so that you can get the relevant habit of information you need. Wikipedia becomes a service that provides info you need.
    • To have a more intuitive way to find help and information
D. Movement decisions are widely respected
  • Movement decisions made transparently, on evidence, by a diverse constituency.
    • There should be true diversity in who has power and positions in the movement
    • more transparency
    • Research evidence drive our activity + priorities for improved results
    • Decision making process for movement
    • Local groups and chapters have a say in a global decisions
  • Clear communication within the Wikimedia Movement
    • Improved communication between communities
    • Clear communication between affiliates/chapter + Wikimedia Foundation
  • Decentralised finance, decision-making, and organisational infrastructure
    • Our movement is well-structured and accessible
    • Breaking down organisational structures, thinking about new ones -> org.equity (governance) - Level the playing field
    • Larger chapters with more resources to take on global responsibilities
    • Decision-making and structures should be more decentralised (not everything coming from San Francisco).
  • Focus on topics, not languages and countries, decentralise.
    • New languages used across the movement
    • In 5 years we have decentralised decision making and finance in transversal user group offering counter power to national based initiatives.
E. Truly user-friendly
  • Ease of use in every way, shape, and form
    • Lively wiki data Ecosystem that equally enables data contribution, editing and usage.
    • Movement + partners make knowledge and education easier and more accessible to people to whom knowledge is not accessible now (use our platform to do this)
    • Every person will easily be able to read and write in any language (w/o having to learn difficult technology)
    • Our platform should be easier to use (as easy as Instagram)
    • It is super easy to contribute to wikimedia projects for individuals and organisations
  • New people want to contribute to Wikipedia because it’s fun, easy and rewarding
    • Engage more young people
    • The value of contributing to wikimedia projects is clearly expressed to multiple audience
    • Contributing to wikimedia (and other projects) is a delightful experience, that you want to do again and again
    • To be opened to someone coming from outside so that they feel welcomed
  • The Wikimedia Movement is open to more diverse ways to contribute
    • Diverse ways to contribute (e.g. oral tradition)
    • Friendly environment in projects (retention)
    • More "marketing" how to contribute and knowledge (i.e. marketing for health)
    • Bigger diversity in local community
  • A Movement that trains and inspires the next generation of Wikimedians
    • Collaborative writing and knowledge sharing is a natural part for all education
    • A new generation of wikimedians is moving the movement forward
  • Wikiprojects user-friendly for non-programmers
    • Ways of being able to contribute without programming knowledge
    • Visuality of Wikimedia in 2030?
    • Wikipedia AI free access for all users
  • "Other forms of knowledge are integrated"
    • "Other forms of knowledge": we will know what these are and what to do with them
  • As easy to use as Instagram or Twitter
    • A renewed Wikimedia infrastructure providing a state of the art user interface [voice, video, social media]
F. No censorship
  • Wikipedia cannot be stopped (no censorship)
    • Wikimedia can’t be stopped by borders (building tech resilience that will mean it can’t be blocked)
  • Wikimedia projects are immune to censorship
    • Wikimedia projects are immune to access censorship

A movement that trains and inspires the next generation of Wikimedians

G. Wikimedia as a Network
  • Participation, cooperation, inclusion are common and rewarded
    • Participation, cooperation, inclusion are common and rewarded
    • Participation in the various wiki projects is growing because the environment is supportive, nurturing and inclusive, so people love participating!
    • Partnerships re default
  • Wikimedia working as a network
    • Flat hierarchies (inside the movement)
    • No differentiation between chapters and use groups (one flexible model)
  • A decentralised global community that is more connected and democratic
    • Increase feeling of community, we/us versus me/they
    • More formats for affiliate cooperation and partnerships
    • Move away from country focus to connect resources, plans, strategies.
    • Clarity + transparency in decision making process
H. Wikimedia movement is a model for "The Big Open"
  • The Wikimedia movement is a part of the "Big Open"
    • Strengthen our ties and relationships with other organisations to be an essential participant in creating the Big Open (e.g. become something akting to the environmental)
  • Wikimedia is ally to other social movements
    • Feminist groups should feel that the wikimedia movement is on their side.
  • Open environment for information
    • Open licences are used in public education
    • Technology platforms in 2030 are NOT privatised
  • The movement is a model of collaboration between distributed multi-lingual organisations
    • Continue to be an example of cooperation for other movements
    • We are truly multilingual movement
    • Cooperation and collaboration between chapters and use groups
I. Nurture the Wiki culture
  • Wikimedia - the kindest and most respectful place on the internet
  • Active sharing of successful Wiki models + culture W/the world
    • Governments understand the value of open licences
    • Increase awareness of wikimedia movement
    • The models of cooperation that make wikimedia successful are clearly articulated and replicable [we share our culture as well as technology]
  • A more welcoming and encouraging Wiki culture
    • In 5 years we have found an effective way to address online and offline harassment to protect volunteers
    • In 5 years anybody attending a Wikipedia event has access to translation/interpretation in their own languages.
    • Appreciation and recognition of contributors [for technical developers]
  • A more inclusive, diverse, welcoming Wikipedia
    • Welcoming WP culture (to a newcomers)
    • More people come to local organisations (chapters and groups) and take over responsibility
    • We know how to adapt our support system for communities with diverse background to provide support that makes sense in their context.
    • The equity we want to see is mirrored in our own org. structures
  • Better trust and communication in the movement
    • We have more and better ways to meet and communicate with each other
    • Better trust between movement stakeholders
  • Shared identity as Wikimedians
    • Collaboration in a community
    • Thinking more as Wikimedians instead of wikipedians
    • Share the same values (among volunteers, across language, geography, etc)
  • Have an accountable roadmap that connects aspiration to recognizable actions for the next ten years
J. Wikimedia movement leads global change
  • The movement has captured the public imagination and is influencing global politics
  • Awareness about WM projects
    • Reach to all the people. But really.
    • A global campaign so that everybody knows how to contribute to our projects
  • High awareness about Wprojects
K. Diversity and Inclusion
  • Diversity: new and missing communities in the movement
    • New & missing communities joining the movement
    • World peace and intercommunication via Wikimedia
    • A diverse movement: gender, geography, etc.
    • More big and small projects outside Wikimedia reuse our content
    • Wikis are connected to maximize reuse/enrichment of content + effort
    • Wikipedia literacy assumed role in education sector globally - all schools teach about WP
    • Double the number of Wikimedians from Africa coming to the Wikimedia conference in Berlin
  • No gender gap
    • In 5 years women represent 30% of editors and an active group in the movement
    • No gender gap
  • Attracting talent + Increasing under-represented groups
    • Double percentage of women participation
    • double number of volunteers everywhere
    • attract talented art, music, literature, economics & other contributors at par with our technologist, scientists, mathematicians,
  • Active Editors increases 50% more young people
    • Increase Active Editors by 50%
    • Maintain or increase the number of young people who use wikimedia
L. The Rest:
  • Larger and more accessible international developer community
    • Connected network of technology hubs
    • Global Volunteer Developer Community
  • Become a leader in technology
    • Become a leader in technology [e.g. limited structured data]
Additional

(Input that did not get selected to be included in the clusters)

  • Accessible, user-friendly tool for communities
    • More user-friendly tools for users and contributors
    • Better access to tools for the communities
  • Focus and resources for shaping legal and social policy
    • Recognised as resistance movement in terms of big data, privacy. Wikimedia will always respect personal choice
    • POLICY (we are a social and political movement)
    • Lawyers are successful at being really pragmatic problem-solvers with the community
    • we are effectively fighting censorship and other ways of denying people access to knowledge
  • The movement has captures the public imagination and is influencing global politics
    • awareness of our projects (and advocacy)
    • general knowledge about Wikimedia like a brand
    • Have three tangible things come about as a result of this process (operations lens)
    • Wikimedia Movement unites and leads access and equity policy globally
  • More content in marginalized languages
    • more content in marginalized languages
    • lots of Sri Lankan content will be digitalized and available on various wiki projects. (commons, wikipedia)
  • Wikipedia - the kindest and most respectful place on the internet
    • Wikipedia becomes known as the most kind, and respectful place on the internet
    • A more friendly environment to newcomers
  • Wikimedia initiatives are trustfully and well-documented so they are providing good learning foundation that also increases literary
    • Wikimedia Movement helped combat anti-knowledge sentiments
    • In 5 years the youngsters reader-consumers group in the fastest growing of the movement
    • Provenance and traceability of information on the internet
  • Broad, reliable offline access
    • Free knowledge is accessible both online and offline
  • Functional and transparent decision making process
    • Functioning and transparent decision making processes
  • Better translation tools
    • Better translation tools
    • Organize by topic & knowledge not by country. Wikimedia Butterflies (all gender, all languages, all regions)
  • Broader copyright laws worldwide
    • ASAP: Freedom of Panorama worldwide
  • 100 $ million in endowment funds
  • For people into make content... Unlock more content to make it freely available
  • Lower barriers to increase participation
    • Intervention that would know a more diverse set of editors to step up
    • Low barrier to new contributors (best practice in learning/teaching)
    • More people have the ability to contribute their knowledge
  • Everybody knows how to participate in Wikimedia project
    • More/better knowledge about the technical structure, projects and programs in the different region in the world
    • Huge step towards our goal of everybody having access to our projects.
  • Economic resources are accessible to everyone
    • Solid financial support in Indonesia
    • make grants easier to get
  • Wikimedia is providing better access to knowledge
    • Wikimedia voice assistant
    • Friendly & attractive interface
    • WP talkpages are really usable
    • Collaboration between wikimedia projects
    • [Machine learning] Harness capabilities of research team (in content gen. M.L. behaviour experiments) to help scale the product/drive product decision in 3 year time frame


AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /