Stewards/confirm/2008/guillom

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

1. (French) Bien qu'ayant exprimé de sérieux doutes envers guillom l'an passé, je pense que son action n'a pas été négative en tant que steward, et suggère sa reconduction / (English) Although I have expressed some strong doubts on guillom last year, I think that his action as a steward was not negative. As a consequence, I suggest that he can be confirmed as a steward. Grimlock 09:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
2. I strongly support guillom's confirmation. Meodudlye 17:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Support. Lovely and helpful. Arria Belli | parlami 20:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Confirming guillom sounds good to me. Cheers Gaillimh 00:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Definitely reconfirm.--Shanel 00:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Gosh yes. ++Lar: t/c 03:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Helpful & communicative - no problems --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
8. He helped revive the SWMT and has since been helping out a lot and it will be good to see him back as a Steward <<<The picture of the bear on his userpage scares me though>> :P .....--Comet styles 11:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
9. Without even the smallest quark of doubt I would like to endorse him, thanks guillom, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 12:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
10. Without guillom I would be lost. Cary Bass ^demandez 14:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
11. We've had our differences, but he's a hard worker, and a good steward, and I have no problem with him being reconfirmed. Majorly (talk ) 19:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
12. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
13. guillom mérite sa reconduction en tant que steward, statut auquel il a su faire honneur.--Bertrand GRONDIN – ^Talk 10:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
    Translation: "Guillom deserves his confirmation as steward, status to which he has done honor." —translated by Pathoschild.
14. I would appreciate it if you'd explain this action and offensive wording in edit summary.[1] --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    I explained and apologized here. guillom 15:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    "Canvassing", "now thery're exporting their hate"... Seriously, does that look like an "apology" to you? I do not wish to confirm any steward who makes comments like that in an international project. --朝彦 (Asahiko) 14:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    While some amount of mutual misunderstandings due to the language or cultural barriers might be inevitable, I take back my opposal after reading this, with hopes that a similar matter will not repeat itself hereafter. --朝彦 (Asahiko) 16:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

15. of course!--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 15:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
16. I will never forget you who wrote "japanese idiots" in the summary column. It is not a dialog that man in a public standpoint may say in a public place in any case though it is necessary to esteem individual thought and the creed. --Hatara Kei 12:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    I'll not defend him as such & I warned him at the time. However, in the heat of argument such as there was on that page, for a human being it was wrong but pardonable in my view. I've worked with guillon across projects, he is a very good steward in my view, a lapse in this way is sad but I would ask that the apology which is sincere is taken into account please. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    The "outburst" was uncharacteristic of guillom, and I'm sure he regrets doing it now. He's apologised, and it should be accepted. Perhaps it may be better for guillom to not comment anymore on Aphaia's candidacy. Thanks. 82.31.11.207 12:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    The candidacy is withdrawn so there should be no further comments by anyone, thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    Sorry friend, I didn't realise. 82.31.11.207 13:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    Do you say that what sincerity can be expected of the person who assumes details of the thing to be "Now they're exporting their hate to meta." without correctly examining it even in the excuse or the apology? I feel that the language barrier is not got over easily strongly. I wanted the person in the standpoint like him/her to behave after it had investigated carefully in an objective standpoint because of but. --Hatara Kei 14:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    Folks, It seems to me: Guillom thinks the Japanese wikipedia contributors are doing bad because they are "canvasing". The Japanese Wikipedia contributors think they are doing good because they are telling the global community something important. Both are potentially valid view points. But did Guillom see the sense of the Japanese Wikipedia community? Forgive me, let me put it this way, does Guillom think the Japanese wikipedians who oppose Aphaia are here simply for vengence? Hillgentleman 01:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    I don't believe the Japanese Wikipedians opposed Aphaia for revenge. I believe they have good reasons to do so. Though, I know Aphaia enough to believe that what wass reproached to her must be the result of several misunderstandings, and that her ban was disproportionate. What made me temporarily upset is that ja:wp users didn't seem to be willing to share this view. I felt Aphaia was harassed by this group of ja:wp users, and I felt harassed too when my vote was commented. I have apologized for my badly chosen words, even though I still feel there is a major unfairness in the whole case. guillom 10:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    By the way, where of a current remark of guillom was the apology of Japanese Wikipedian included? At least, words of apology were not found in the range that I had read. Or, is my language ability insufficient for this? Man is a living thing that falls in mistake. However, I think that what action he/she does when committing an offense and the person's nature is clarified. From beginning to end of the excuse based on a personal interpersonal relationship with Aphaia as for a current remark of guillom. I think that he/she doesn't admit a fundamental mistake. Therefore, I fear the possibility of selecting the same action this time when guillom will fall into the same kind of situation this time in the future high. I also admit the problem to be in the action of a part of, Japanese Wikipedian about the Aphaia's election. But, I hope when the fact of having thought that a lot of Japanese who do not want to take part in meta usually cannot help taking part in Aphaia's election also wants you to think. --Hatara Kei 17:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    His (second) apology is to be found here, if You can't forgive it is Your matter, but I hope, You never get into a situation where You did something wrong, and are not forgiven even after sincerly apologizing afterwards. Please end this discussion here (and try to forgive). thanks, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 17:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    It consented. I wish to express my gratitude for your point. --Hatara Kei 17:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

17. Support: I do not always agree with all guillom's opinions, but I think he makes a good stuff as a steward. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 21:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
18. support i think he makes a good stuff as a steward (like Hégésippe) --P@d@w@n e 09:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
19. honoré de Support Supporter --clamengh 12:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
    Translation: "Honored to support." —translated by Pathoschild.
20. A general Support Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
21. Support Support --Gribeco 00:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
22. Support Support--Jusjih 21:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
23. Support Support helpful and lovely. Guillom have done, do and will go on to do very good work on Wikimedia.Bapti 12:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
24. Support Support --Ahonc 13:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
25. Support Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

    (削除) Oppose Oppose -- Anonymous000 00:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)(sorry but I do not have enough time and ability to explain what I think exactly. so I wrote the comment in Japanese.)--Stewards/elections_2007/statements/Aphaiaでの自身の不適切な発言に対する2度の謝罪は、とても真摯で信頼できるものでした。しかしながら、それでもなお、スチュワードへの(再)信任に賛成できません。理由は次の通りです。上記のページでの議論を拝見した限りにおいて、自身の意見の正当性を主張するために、多数の日本語版のコミュニティの利用者の意見に耳を傾けることなく、また、jawpのコミュニティの「コンセンサス」による「無期限ブロックの決定」をも考慮せず、自身のスチュワードの地位もしくは権限、ないし、個人的な経験のみを根拠に判断を下す姿勢は、Steward_policies#Don't decideの規定する、"Their task is to implement valid community decisions"という「ポリシー」に照らして、スチュワードとしては明らかに不適切な判断姿勢であると、私としては考えざるを得ません。申し訳ありません。なお、信任された場合に、将来、日本語版ウィキペディア(等)に関するAphaia氏からの個人的要望があったとしても、日本語版ウィキペディアのコミュニティの意思を確認することなく、何らかのスチュワードとしての行動(権限行使等)を行うことは、決してしないよう、お願いいたします(guillomさんを含む、全てのメタ及びウィキメディア財団の関係者の方々へも)。--Anonymous000 00:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC) (削除ここまで) striked (not on time) --Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 00:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm/2008/guillom&oldid=26366926"

Category:

• Steward confirmations 2008