Stewards/Confirm/2014/J.delanoy
Appearance
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.
logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement
English:
- Languages: en
- Personal info: I apologize for my lateness in making my confirmation statement. I have given a lot of thought on whether to stand for reconfirmation this year or not. My activity level, while not terribly low in terms of raw actions, is admittedly quite erratic and sporadic. I think that I can still provide benefit to the project as a steward during those times that my real-life obligations allow me to participate here, but if people think that my activity levels are too low, I am willing to step down. J.delanoy gabs adds 21:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
español:
- Idiomas: en
- Información personal: translation needed
русский:
- Языки: en
- Личная информация: translation needed
Deutsch:
- Sprachen: en
- Informationen zur Person: Übersetzung nötig
- Keep Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep J.delanoy's activity levels are highly volatile, with generally half of the year of little to no activity, but they are significant enough for me to see a continued benefit in his rights being maintained. Snowolf How can I help? 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep No concerns. Not as active as he once was but still active enough. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep --Rs chen 7754 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep (weak support) --Alan (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remove Remove; months of total inactivity, no thanks. --MF-W 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep no problems with their actions, some more would be beneficial — billinghurst sDrewth 02:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep MBisanz talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep (weak) more helping hands are needed but activity levels are concerning. --Glaisher [talk] 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remove Remove; months of total inactivity --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remove Remove not active --Golden burg 111 17:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep We need experienced stewards around, even if they only occasionally contribute. --Abd (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep support --►Cekli 829 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Risker (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remove Remove, inactive for some months = seems to not need steward rights. --Zerabat (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep – the volatile activity doesn't concern me enough to oppose this confirmation, and the user has done otherwise well as a steward. T C N7JM 03:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep —레비 Revi 06:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep. AGK [•] 18:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep J. is indeed inactive half of the year, but is active enough to me the rest of the year. Considering his actions since 2010, he is not that inactive. If he wants to continue to serve as a steward, I'm certainly not going to stand in the way. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep a little doubt as he's not that active, but no concerns with their actions either Trijnstel talk 18:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep. I agree with Quentinv57. Mathonius (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep per Ajraddatz. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep, reasonably active in the past 12 months, that's enough for me. Elfix 18:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep. I have some very small concers with low activity and with being more active close to elections. However, he does a good job when around.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S ˲» 21:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Jianhui67 talk ★contribs 12:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep I love you all~~ ✒ Bennylin 13:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Neutral Neutral Unfortunately, never seen before.--Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Sufficiently active, when active Courcelles 14:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep, nothing to complain about. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- continues to have my trust --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep, very useful steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC) [reply ]