From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Komentarze:

1. Support Support Fajne. tsca [re] 11:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Support Support Bez ściemy Przykuta 14:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Przydałaby się jeszcze strona informująca jak edytować, zamiast zbioru linków - czasami nieaktualizowanych dinozaurów. Przykuta 19:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Zgodnie z tym co piszą ludzie od fundacji to co mówisz nie jest prawdziwe. Ludzie którzy chcą dać kasę to nie są ludzie którzy chcą edytować. Wyraźnie była informacja że Fundacja stara się nie namawiać do edytowania w tej zbiórce bo to tylko odstrasza. PMG 09:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Jestem empirykiem. Nie zgadzam się z tym co mniemają ludzie z fundacji. Nie znają naszej kultury. Nie dostali jeszcze większego grosza od pl czytelników, mimo swoich pompatycznych, zupełnie dla nas nietrafnych banerów. Przykuta 21:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

3. Support Support Uczciwe podejście, podoba mi się. Karol007 ✉ 15:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Support Support Rzeczywiście uczciwe. PMG 15:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Support Support Dobre - szczere i dające alternatywę dla wpłat.--Wiher 17:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Support Support Proste, uczciwe, lubię to :-). Nux (talk) 22:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Support Support Dobre x 2. Kpjas 07:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Support Support Bezpośrednie, szczere, wyciąga kasę z konta. Kenraiz 20:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. Support Support Za. Zureks 21:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. Support Support Za. Motywujące dla tych co nie chcą edytować - pokazuje, że mogą przysłużyć się inaczej. Niewielki minus to polaryzacja, skoro już edytuję/edytowałem, to nie muszę wpłacać. Nova 12:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. Support Support Za. Każdy może się przysłużyć. A jak ktoś pokocha, to będzie i edytował i wpłacał. Psychology 04:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
12. Support Support Proste, uczciwe, może trafić do odbiorcy. Chrumps 19:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Komentarze:

1. Support Support To jest konkretny przekaz - podoba mi się. tsca [re] 11:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Support Support Podoba się. PMG 15:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Support Support Bardzo dobre, Karol007 ✉ 15:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Support Support Bardzo trafne. --Wiher 18:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Support Support Dobre. Kpjas 07:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Support Support Bardzo dobre i nawiązuje do konkretu, a nie abstraktu - ludzie lubią wiedzieć na co idzie kasa, a tutaj jest zawarty konkretny przykład. MOs810 20:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Support Support Dobre. Dobitne i jasne. A przekaz zrozumiały dla każdej chyba grupy wiekowej. Gripper 17:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Support Support Jestem za. Zureks 21:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. Support Support Doskonałe. MadBunny 18:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. Support Support W zasadzie może być, choć ktoś może to odebrać jako robienie z niego idioty (że niby nie wiem co to serwer?). Podtytuł "robimy zrzutę" mnie bardzo drażni. Lepiej byłoby to zastąpić "robimy zbiórkę pieniędzy". Psychology 04:38, 22 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. Serwery na prąd - to wiemy.. a na co robimy zrzutę? Na wódkę? (Ja nie piję :P ) Za mało realistyczne. 83.10.9.193 10:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
12. "Robimy zrzutę" jest zbyt kolokwialne. Wikipedia to nie forum nastolatków. Matrek Oct 28, 2010
13. Support Support Fajne. A nastolatką byłam dobre ponad 20 lat temu ;-). Gytha 06:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Komentarze:

1. Support Support Dobre. Sp5uhe 15:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Support Support Jasny przekaz. Makawity 10:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Support Support może być. PMG 15:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Support Support Przejrzyste, mi się podoba. Karol007 ✉ 15:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Support Support Jasne i proste; słowem dobre. --Wiher 18:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Support Support Dobre. Kpjas 07:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Support Support Podoba mi się! Gripper 17:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Support Support Bardzo dobre. Zureks 21:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. Support Support Dobre 123owca321 12:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. Support Support Może być, bo pokazuje, że coś dostajesz, więc mają prawo Cię o coś prosić. "Dorzuć się" do mnie nie przemawia, nikt by tak do mnie nie powiedział i nie spoufaliłam się na tyle z Wiki. "Dorzuć cegiełkę" brzmi lepiej, choć będziecie się czepiać, że Internet nie jest z cegły ;P Psychology 04:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. Support Support Podoba mi się. Chrumps 18:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
12. Support Support Najlepszy baner, trafia idealnie w sedno sprawy Support Support Wechu 16:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
13. Support Support Bardzo dobre, nie trzeba się domyślać o co chodzi tak jak w pozostałych. Ojcon 20:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Submitted on: 2010年10月16日
Comments:

1. Cijenimo trud, no previše je gramatičkih pogrješaka. Treba biti u duhu hrvatskog jezika, no umjesto toga, tekst izgleda kao strojni prijevod. Kubura 23:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Predloži kako bi sadržaj poruke trebao glasiti, tako da bude u duhu hrv. jezika i da pritom smisao ostane nepromenjen. Verujem da će Anton008 uvažiti predlog. Ja bih to učinio, ali ipak ne poznajem toliko dobro hrvatski jezik, pa bih verovatno napravio više štete nego koristi. Pozdrav! micki t 07:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Ova poruka je po mom mišljenju u duhu hrvatskog jezika, govori o tome kako nam malo fali do 100.000 članaka i da bi baš zato trebali pomoći.-Anton008 10:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Submitted on: 2010年10月12日
Comments:

1. Molto gradito nella versione in inglese (ma non ancora provato), non vedo perché non dovrebbe funzionare anche da noi. Lascio "non profit" anche se tecnicamente sarebbe "senza scopo di lucro", "non a scopo di lucro" o "non lucrativo". Può essere riformulato perché funzioni anche negli altri progetti WMF, che nel loro insieme sono il quinto gruppo di siti piú visitato al mondo secondo comScore. Che ne dite? --Nemo 21:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. A me piaceva anche in inglese, però credo che il dato citato si riferisca al complesso dei progetti WMF, non alla sola WP. User:Elitre

Submitted on: 2010年10月06日
Comments:

1. Linguisticamente pesante. Preferisco «Ti regaliamo un'enciclopedia», che prende in giro i piazzisti. --Nemo 07:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   (Non è più visibile, ma mi pare che su Flickr avevo caricato una foto dello slogan che avevo usato una volta, Non vendiamo enciclopedie, ne scriviamo una insieme a te (o una roba così). User:Elitre

   Bellissima quella di Elitre!--Sandrobt 00:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

2. versione Elitre: deciso +1 --Xaura 18:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Questa è senz'altro meravigliosa. Sostituisco la versione di Cruccone, aggiungo la richiesta di donazione (va bene?) e segno come "approvato" perché ci piace proprio tanto. :-) --Nemo 20:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Wikipedia

Commenti:

• "L'unico sito non profit ecc." non mi sembra il massimo della chiarezza, perché di primo acchito uno pensa ai "5 siti non profit più visitati" e ha l'impressione di qualcosa che non va. Ci vuole un momento a capire che è sottinteso solo "siti" e non "siti non profit". Forse sarebbe meglio "L'unico non profit tra i 5 siti più visitati al mondo". --Vermondo 12:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Wikiquote

Brazil only

Portugal only

Non-Brazil/Portugal

Comments:

1. Clever, but I worry that active links besides donate links might detour readers away from the donation page Ocaasi 23:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
   • So we just don't link 'em. :) Is the us vs them thing an issue here? Philippe (WMF) 22:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. I like it. V85 13:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. I love it personally but ZZ Top might not be so known for every our reader. --Aphaia 10:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Like that one. Note that different language versions should use own words from Special:Allpages, and they could eliminate things that sound too strange (nonetheless, it's rather important to show how big our database is, not so much to choose words everyone knows). —Pill (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
   1. Point taken, Pill. So my full support. --Aphaia 06:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. If you have language-specific replacements for AA Milne and ZZ Top you should post them here! For Turkish: Tarkan & Volkan Demirel --17:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
   1. +1 yes. I like this one but you're right having options for language specific localization would be VERY nice :) Jalexander 22:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. If we already have "everything", where's the need for "growing"? I would prefer seeing the emphasis on our unperfectness and vulnarability. Ziko 13:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. +1 to Ziko. Till Mletzko (WMDE) 13:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Me likey. :) --Cybercobra 19:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. iLike! But Ziko has a good point. PrincessofLlyr 19:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. Reminds me of the Centrum slogan ("from A to Zinc"). Nice idea, though I agree with Ziko's reasoning also. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 19:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. I don't like this. Ziko is right. --Nemo 08:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

No "no ads" banners.--OsamaK 14:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Support since us having ads is extremely unlikely considering the community's past response. --Cybercobra 20:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I'm a fan, keeps to the core a bit more. Allmightyduck 17:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Technically we do have bias. Mr.Z-man 21:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:'

1. May be good in a bunner like "we're making people smarter since 2001", but 'look smart' is bad idea. Lvova 12:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. I love this one! If you have the kind of self ridicule humour as I do it really is great fun! Jopparn 20:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Too touchy, people might be insulted. "Making people smarter" does not bring personal connection (aka "so let people pay for it"). Renata3 02:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. I love it! Serenity.id 09:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

1. Per suggestion. sonia 10:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. yo --Jan eissfeldt 18:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Different from what? I can see this being confusing for readers. Perhaps preface it with something like "The only non-commercial website in the Top X" --Church of emacs talk · contrib 17:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Support this version. Most people realize that Wikipedia is different.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Same question of CoE. Also iirc some firm uses (or has used) a copy "think difference" or whatsoever. We could be seen a copycat, I'm afraid. --Aphaia 06:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Support. The difference is inherent, self-evident, part of the project at its roots. No worries about copycats; 'different' is a generic concept unless it's literally "Think different" which would be a problem. Ocaasi 21:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. +1 to Coe. Till Mletzko (WMDE) 14:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Agree strongly w/ Church of Emacs' suggestion. --Cybercobra 19:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. I also agree with CoE. Sorry. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 19:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. For some reason it reminded me of "I'm not like everybody else" song by the Kinks, Wikipedia is'nt your typical encyclopedia either, its much larger and frankly cooler than any traditional encyclopedia.Theo10011 17:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. Oppose. Too appley "think different", and per 'different from what?' but not quite interesting enough to bother clicking. Chzz 00:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

1. I don't like the idea of dependencies. People should not depend on Wikimedia for their information... --Nemo 07:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

• Like it, but people already think so. User:Elitre

Comments:

1. I like it. sonia 07:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. I like "Be part of something..." to convey a sense of belonging and community but I don't like "too important to ignore", who is ignoring Wikipedia? Theo10011 12:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Yeah! "Be part of something..." is good stuff. Anya 17:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Interesting, and I think I like it, though it needs a donate link. fetch comms ☛ 23:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Yes, I like it. Tie in to donate or support per Fetchcomms. My76Strat 04:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

1. Trying to imply a sense of ownership.Theo10011 13:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. It's also their work. Like I said above, supporters probably often fancy themselves as sometimes-editors as well, even if only IP. I think it's important that we foster that self-identity that they are "the kind of person that contributes to Wikipedia", even if all they've done in the past is correct typos. Gigs 01:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Same problem with the 'this page' issue, since screenshots of it above unsavory content will look very bad. Otherwise, I like. Consider changing 'this page' to 'Wikipedia'. Also, support 'our' work has a bit of the us/them issue. Not sure what the best ask would be, but maybe something different Ocaasi 11:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Or just "this". But I'm not sure that a general statement on the whole project will work as well as a more direct one to the actual page the reader is viewing. And I don't think that "unsavory content" would be a big issue. Let's try both (also the following one). --Nemo 07:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

1. hmm....what can we do together?...World Domination(half way there)....I like it.Theo10011 05:41, 24 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   "We are Wikipedians. You'll be edited. Resistance is futile"? --Aphaia 19:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   haha, true. Theo10011 17:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

• Better phrased than other similar alternatives. --Cybercobra 20:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• It's the 5th. --Nemo 08:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

1. Love the idea! Wording nitpicks: languages and countries are kinda the same thing. replace it with something else (editors? edits? readers?). Also would replace entries with articles. Renata3 01:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Sorry, languages and countries are very different things. For example, English is a language, spoken in countries like England, Australia, New Zealand and the USA Jebus989 20:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Not sure if Renata3 meant "the same thing" as in languages and countries are the same concept; perhaps he meant they both have the same effect. 119.74.135.219 10:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

2. Perhaps the number of users (readers) can be included? Hundreds of millions if I'm not wrong. Also, you might want to tread carefully with the no. of countries listed. 270 – does that include unrecognised and irredentist states? 119.74.135.219 10:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. A nice idea. It seems a little wordy, but the message somehow takes away that negative.
4. Why 35ドル? That might be too much for some people. Lexicografía 21:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   35ドル is our average donation --Deniz (WMF) 22:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Average or median? One 100,000 $ donation and nine 10 $ produces an average of 10,009 ,ドル whereas the median and more likely donation is only 10 $. --88.130.160.172 10:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Average. --Nemo 08:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

5. Like it, but I'd use a smaller amount too. User:Elitre
6. Reasonable idea, but I don't know what the 'animation' is all about. 35ドル seems high, but some-odd-number is good. 23ドル? 17ドル? something lesser. As above - median, not mean. Chzz 00:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. I began drawing a picture of the WMF becoming PBS with this banner. :)) --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 07:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Countries is definitely wrong. And I don't think that throwing a money amount into the reader's face is a good idea to improve click-rate, given previous tests. --Nemo 08:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Quite possible but we've found that improving click rate is by far not the most important thing. Banners that have something about donating are tending to have a higher conversion rate and more donations. The "curious" ones just have people click and not donate. Jalexander 07:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

9. I don't think having a suggested figure in the banner is a good idea, that is far better done on the landing page. Otherwise it's not bad. the wub "?!" 23:31, 10 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

'Comments:

1. This sounds too much like a threat. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 20:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Yeah, too close to an ultimatum. Perhaps something more like "Wikipedias' tomorrow depends on today's Wikipedian". My76Strat 04:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• I like it. --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Too direct & open-ended? Like the idea behind it, but stir people into the right direction (i.e. a lot) Renata3 02:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments: Note: Love the first two sentences. "Please consider" is a little too polite and passive. Donate Today seems more to the point. Rhandler (WMF)

This was used last year.--OsamaK 11:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• "Please consider" sounds pretty to me. Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

"Donate now" instead of "Please consider" and I am confident about this one Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

It is in my nature to tend towards politeness rather than commands, but I agree; "donate now" is better than "please consider..." So I support this banner so long as that is changed. --Bodnotbod 13:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• I like it --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Excellent. --Cybercobra 20:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Like it Anthere

Comments:

1. Love this message. It's like a language vocab. lesson + cultural appreciation all rolled up in a banner. Megan Hernandez (WMF)
2. ♥ Cbrown1023 talk 14:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. great idea --Jan eissfeldt 22:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. This would be great for Wiktionary, especially if the X linked to the word's entry. --Yair rand 22:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
   • While I like what you're saying, Yair rand, I worry that linking people to anything but the donation form from the banners will result in potential drop-off prior to hitting the donation pages. Philippe (WMF) 18:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. I heart this. Philippe (WMF) 22:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. I like this one a lot. ++Lar: t/c 22:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Just add a "donate now" and I ́m positive about this one Till Mletzko (WMDE) 11:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. This one is fantastic :) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 12:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. I don't know is it possible to translate it to many languages. Lvova 04:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. I like it. V85 13:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. Um, brilliant. Anya 14:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
12. Outstanding. [Language]=Afrikaans, X="kennis". -- Jeandré, 2010年09月08日t17:32z

Help translate Knowledge --dgultekin 18:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Greek / γνώση

Chinese / 知識

Russian / знания

Italian / conoscenza

Hindi / ज्ञान

Portuguese / conhecimento

Kanji Japanese / 知識

Swahili / elimu

Norwegian / kunnskap

Turkish / bilgi

Spanish / Conocimiento

French / Connaissance

Galician / Coñecemento

Polish / wiedza

1. Like it. User:Elitre

Comments:

Notes: Is "We" vs "You" a message that we like? Philippe (WMF) 20:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Maybe instead it could say: Wikipedia is there for you every day. Be there for Wikipedia today. Ocaasi 05:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

I presume you mean that it would substitute the local site name? As in, "Wikibooks is there for you every day..."? Philippe (WMF) 17:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

I figure the majority of funds will come from Wikipedia. But substitutions can be made on any ad. I think they mock-up better without 'Meta' as a placeholder. User:Ocaasi 01:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Only a good one if we use "wikipedia" instead of "we" Till Mletzko (WMDE) 09:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Oooooh, I like this. Philippe (WMF) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I also like this. I was a bit surprised by the whole thing being linked. It might be more intuitive to only link the second phrase, for both emphasis and for an obvious click-target. Ocaasi 05:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Such a hint is not bad. We could emphasize more that our site is the only non commercial site among the top 10.Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 now the 6th... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Not bad (if we keep the 5th). Or as Ziko suggests, say "the biggest non-commercial website" instead. --Aphaia 06:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Might be very nice combined with other messages! (if you first see a flash that it is the 5th website, and then our mission...) Consider geo-localizing this. Effeietsanders 10:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Submitted on: 2010年09月08日
Comments:

1. I like this. Quite a lot, actually. Philippe (WMF) 00:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Needs a donate link, but I like this too. sonia 04:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Might be a nice one! Especially without donate link, just targets a different group of people. Effeietsanders 10:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Oh my. This one is beautiful. sonia 08:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• "... not to have it." Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

wikipedia ≠ knowledge, therefore too ambitious Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• This one is far superior to the others I've seen. Mono 02:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I love this one. Although it might be wikt:TLDR ;) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I think this is spectacular. It's powerful, and motivating, at least to me. Philippe (WMF) 07:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Nice word play, but it has this idea "you pay, you get". Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I actually like this one. Quite a lot. :) Philippe (WMF) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• With some good copy on the landing page I see this being incredibly effective. --dgultekin 18:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Notes: I like this one. It feels like a gentle reminder, but still has a call to action. Philippe (WMF) 20:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• +1 Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• +2 Till Mletzko (WMDE) 09:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• yeah, should work global (imho) --Jan eissfeldt 22:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Cool :) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Definitely Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Now this is a good one. —I-20 the highway 03:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• I like it. It's cross-project. Philippe (WMF) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 (maybe we could run a test whether it is useful to add a "donate now". that would be good one to test the effect of a "donate now"). Till Mletzko (WMDE) 13:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

I'm a fan. I would maybe shorten the second part to "Make it happpen" if we're including a "donate now" button. Megan Hernandez (WMF)

• I like it.--Aphaia 06:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Submitted on: 2010年09月08日
Comments:

1. I like this. Quite a lot, actually. Philippe (WMF) 00:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Needs a donate link, but I like this too. sonia 04:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Might be a nice one! Especially without donate link, just targets a different group of people. Effeietsanders 10:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Oh my. This one is beautiful. sonia 08:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• "... not to have it." Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

wikipedia ≠ knowledge, therefore too ambitious Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• This one is far superior to the others I've seen. Mono 02:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I love this one. Although it might be wikt:TLDR ;) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 13:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I think this is spectacular. It's powerful, and motivating, at least to me. Philippe (WMF) 07:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Nice word play, but it has this idea "you pay, you get". Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I actually like this one. Quite a lot. :) Philippe (WMF) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• With some good copy on the landing page I see this being incredibly effective. --dgultekin 18:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Oooooh, I like this. Philippe (WMF) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I also like this. I was a bit surprised by the whole thing being linked. It might be more intuitive to only link the second phrase, for both emphasis and for an obvious click-target. Ocaasi 05:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Such a hint is not bad. We could emphasize more that our site is the only non commercial site among the top 10.Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

+1 now the 6th... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Not bad (if we keep the 5th). Or as Ziko suggests, say "the biggest non-commercial website" instead. --Aphaia 06:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Might be very nice combined with other messages! (if you first see a flash that it is the 5th website, and then our mission...) Consider geo-localizing this. Effeietsanders 10:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Submitted on: 2010年09月09日
Comments:

1. Yes I think this is an important point to get across.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   I agree, I think it is important to point out the no-ads-all-donations-character. Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

2. Might be very nice! Effeietsanders 10:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Heh (I love it). --Aphaia 16:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Dislike. I thought we weren't going to use "Threat of a future-advertisement here." type-ads, or however these were eloquently described before. Quiddity 22:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. It looks like an ad: it is one. Bad one. —I-20 the highway 22:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• I love it :) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 14:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Great Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• I like it. Philippe (WMF) 23:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• +1 Till Mletzko (WMDE) 12:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Simple, persuasive, very nice. User:Ocaasi 19:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I like it too. → Spiritia 10:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Comments:

1. Obviously, WP only. Something similar could be run for commons though. Philippe (WMF) 22:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Clever! I like it, although it can not be used on all Wikipedias (on dewiki, we don't have a "citation needed" template) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 12:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Good but nothing new here. Anya 14:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Fine, but obviously WP only. I don't like to have it on my homes, e.g. Wikiquote. --Aphaia 10:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
   • Agreed. Please see this diff for my thoughts on project specific messaging. Philippe (WMF) 15:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
   • This could be used at Wikiquote by substituting "quotes" for "knowledge." ~ Ningauble 16:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Meh, the superscript is just cute. Actually, the brand name could be omitted, as the banner runs adjacent to the logo, beginning "The world's greatest..."—or is that heresy? ~ Ningauble 16:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Insiders joke - not so sure about that one. Effeietsanders 09:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Chuckle, but would not click on the superscript. Renata3 03:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• I'm not sure why this is in the funny section, but I think it's fantastic. It seems to have done exceptionally well in yesterday's test, too.--Ragesoss 13:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Ditto Ragesoss. Great slogan. (Although it was PBS's tagline 10 years ago. Not necessarily a bad thing...) Quiddity 00:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I would click it, but it would not make me donate. Jopparn 20:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Notes:

1. I rather like this. Throwing the words "non-profit" in front of people is not a bad thing, I think. Philippe (WMF) 21:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   +1 --OsamaK 15:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   +2 but why innovative? Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   +3. Innovative, because it's an inherently adaptive, disruptive technology that's changing the world. Ocaasi 23:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   and do you think that donors/public know about that? I do have some doubts about that. People don ́t know that there is something like MediaWiki. My question was therefore meant to be provocative. If we leave it like that I would like to a/b-test further information on that aspect Till Mletzko (WMDE) 11:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

2. I love it! Short, simple, informative --Church of emacs talk · contrib 14:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Great Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

1. Note: I modified this one to be "5th", rather than "7th". The comscore numbers support this. Philippe (WMF) 18:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Notes: This one is fantastic --Dgultekin 22:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

1. I would love to have him writing a letter. Maybe one of the few persons that would work as a testimonial on a global level. Till Mletzko (WMDE) 10:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   +1 --Church of emacs talk · contrib 14:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

2. Yes. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Appealing and simple.Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Would need to be modified for commons. Philippe (WMF) 23:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I like it --Church of emacs talk · contrib 14:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Notes:

• I'm very fond of this. Philippe (WMF) 20:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

I like this one aswell. But there has to be some further information in what way we (can) change the world. Till Mletzko (WMDE) 13:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Quite emphatic, and provoking the question what actually changes. Ziko 16:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I like this one too. --Bodnotbod 13:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• We should correlate to the donor survey and see if this rates as a motivation for giving. Philippe (WMF) 23:00, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I feel as if every charity is asking for help changing the world... Too worn out for my taste. Renata3 02:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Notes:

1. I love this. It gives some semblance of scope, and a call to action. Philippe (WMF) 20:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
2. I like it too. Great feeling. I might shorten it to "1 Entry became 13 million. Donate today." Rebecca (WMF)
3. I also like this. Perhaps a variant could be created, with the "protect" line looking forward toward apparently endless potential instead of looking toward how much has been done so far. --Yair rand 06:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. On my computer the three lines don't fit. Is that an issue for the banners? User:Ocaasi 09:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Noted from the test: it's difficult to explain that the number of entries is cross-project. Philippe (WMF) 21:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   Perhaps "One entry in one language became 33 millions [entries] in 280 [languages]"? --Nemo 08:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

6. Rather than "Help protect what we’ve created", how about "Help us go even further"? Mike Peel 21:19, 22 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   +1--OsamaK 15:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

7. Yep. Mono 01:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Very nice! --Church of emacs talk · contrib 14:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. I hate the "Help protect what we’ve created". Beginning is very powerful while this is very blah & introduces "us" vs "you". How 'bout: "Your donation will keep it growing." Renata3 03:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fundraising_2010/Messages/Tested&oldid=24892957"

Category:

• Fundraising 2010