User talk:Tegel

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Bk Kgarcia44 (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Reply

No thanks. -- Tegel _(Talk) 13:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Reply

You sent me a msg (no vandalism)if you remember it Well, i edited only some spam information nothing more and now i cant edit anymore because i'm blocked Can you help me out with this missunderstanding? Please reply— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nick.bisha (talk)

If you refer to your edit on sq.wikipedia that was no spam that you deleted. So no, I can't help you with the block. -- Tegel _(Talk) 20:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Reply

I know that you removed my admin userbox I was about to comfort you before the message and yes I'm not an administrator but I like the decoration on my User:Page.
Please don't remove my userboxes.
I have a testing corner that you could edit on.
Thank you.
Battle of Z 2: God on God ^talk

When you have that template on your user page it will end up in this category: Category:Meta-Wiki administrators. And since your not an admin that is wrong. And regarding your edit comment, I'm a real admin here. -- Tegel _(Talk) 00:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

I honestly don't care why/or if it appears there I'm keeping that on my User:Page, this is your last warning or I'll go to a real administrator (which you aren't).
Please use the testing corner .
Thank you.
Battle of Z 2: God on God ^talk

Here you can find a list of admins . Go ahead if you don't find me on the list. -- Tegel _(Talk) 00:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

Okay yes you're an administrator and I will stop adding myself to the admin list (also know as when I performed the transaction when I added the admin userbox)
Also did you add the rightful signatures to my User:Page? and did you try Testing Corner?
Battle of Z 2: God on God ^talk
Why are you ignoring me?

There is a signing function that will add your signature as well as time and date. You add it by enter four "tilde" ~~~~. There is also an icon at the top of the edit window that looks like a pen. Use that one and it will be OK. You can then customize it in the settings, but leave that for now. For testing users normally use the sandbox that you can find here Meta:Sandbox. It's not recommended to edit another users user page. -- Tegel _(Talk) 00:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

I don't care about that signature functioning its gay and I'm not using it, I'll use these types instead you said that you knew why my signature was failing.
I don't care about the "sandbox" either and how iron this is that you were editing on my User:Page earlier but then your now saying " It's not recommended to edit another users user page."
I don't know what to do here because you said you know what's wrong suddenly your against something that you've done 40 minutes ago.
And stop replying on your own talk page its annoying.
Thank you.
►Celsius 829

Please don't use "gay" as a synonym for "bad". It's offensive to many users. Tegel explicitly says that he will reply on his talkpage. Read the big green box at the top of the page! "If you leave a message here, I will reply here. In normal case I will not reply by e-mail." You should have read this before commenting here. Also, ~~~~ will add whatever your signature is set to in preferences. It's okay if you want to change it to basically copy Cekli829's, but you should at least put that in your preferences and use ~~~~. If you really don't want to use four tildes, at least add five so it generates a timestamp (e.g. 02:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)). The sandbox is basically the same idea as your testing area, so I don't understand why you like one but not the other. Best regards, PiRSquared17 (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

Okay when I copied it I was supposed to change it aroundand why haven't you replied to this revision yet?
You must know it exists.
Raging Blast

Nostal
Okay all of my signatures' are functioning and working properly and I've read the green box please my reply to my talk page
Thank you.
Nostal

Hi, could you please block this user on sh.wikipedia, as s/he is vandalising an artile there (there seem to be no administrators around). Thanks, --Igor Windsor (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi. I noticed that you already got some help. -- Tegel _(Talk) 20:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

porque borraste mi página?— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Escuela TAI (talk)

I guess that you want to know why I deleted the page that you created? Your user page is not the place for an article. It's the place for you as a user to present yourself to the rest of the community. Since your account is blocked on Commons for being a promotion-only account I assume that you know that promotional material will be deleted. The material was also off-topic material for this wiki, so that was another reason for deleting the page. -- Tegel _(Talk) 23:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

...for this revert. The author is an eswikiquote LTA (who has been vandalizing since 2005 and is community-banned on that project) and I think that their edit and edit summary should be hidden, as both contain defamatory and libelous information. Kind regards, LlamaAl (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

You deleted this user's page. The page was created following this welcome

"Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello, Possibilities. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing! -- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)"

The user page was created due to a suggestion that user pages are essential, as are signatures. You suggested in wording on YOUR USER PAGE that after such action there would be additional comment on the "Talk" page belonging to User:Possibilities; however, there was no comment.

Was User:Possibilities creating a user page in the wrong "place"? Currently a search is underway to discover how to customize a signature for this user so there will be no misunderstanding about posts, etc.

Please help elucidate via a response.--Possibilities (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi. The user page was created at the right place. The problem was that you forgot to login using your account. Because of that we couldn't know that it was the right person that created the user page. Just remember to login before editing your user page and everything should be OK. -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Thanks, T....i've reestablished the user's page while logged in and hope it meets approval. If not, give me a clue...i'm usually a quick study............--Possibilities (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

User:possibilities here... correcting/editing from you has provided leadership, an elevated position that attracts request for additional guidance. Having established a user page, detailed "Preferences" page and set out to explore wiki attractions in general, surprise was generated by inability to log in on other wiki pages. Information on this page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Unified_login allows that registering a name on any wiki automatically reserves that name on all others. Attempts to log on as Possibilities, while successful on some pages was foiled on most. Can you give hope for correction? Thank you for your patience --Possibilities (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi, I see that yu blocked me (83.38.111.118), but I'm nota vandal: q:ca:Especial:contribucions/Unapersona and w:ca:Especial:Contribucions/Unapersona. Why you blocked me?--Unapersona (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi. I blocked an IP-address that I consider did less constructive edits. That might have been someone else that had the same IP-address before you. I have changed the block so you can login with your account. -- Tegel _(Talk) 12:04, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Thank you.--Unapersona (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

I do not understand the link between change and vandalize. --Ele.strut98 (talk) 17:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Removing the content of an article and replacing it with "Vandalismus facere" is not a change. That is vandalism. -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hej Tegel, är sanningen jag kopierat innehåll från en annan sida diskussion eftersom mitt konto har blockerats på obestämd tid totalt. Jag kommer att ångra redigeringen. Hälsningar, Belagrip _talk 15:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Do you really speak Swedish? If your account is blocked and you create a new account you circumvent your block. The result of that is that the new account will be blocked as well. -- Tegel _(Talk) 15:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Berättar Ibland sanningen inte passar. Vänligen Belagrip låser upp. 190.232.186.243 15:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hannibal lyckades med konststycket att automatblockera mig (och troligen roboten också) när han återblockerade Lavallen på svwp. Kan du fixa det? -- Innocent bystander (talk) 14:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Reply

Då ska det vara ordnat. -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:19, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Reply

Dear user:Tegel, Thank you for the change. When I click on my name in the table at https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submission_review#Education_1, the link directs to regular article pages and not my user page at https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Geraldshields11. Please fix if you have time. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hej

Vi är två studenter från Linköpings Universitet som gör vårt examensarbete om motivationsfaktorer för att bidra med Open Educational Resources. Vi letar efter personer som skulle vara villiga att ställa upp på en intervju via skype. Är det något som du skulle kunna hjälpa oss med? Om du kan vore vi oerhört tacksamma!

Vår mailadress är: ottve507@student.liu.se

Mvh Otto och Fredrik

Hej. Tyvärr så använder jag mig inte av Skype eller liknande tjänster. Så jag får nog avstå denna gång, men lycka till med undersökningen. -- Tegel _(Talk) 12:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Reply

Really want to thank you and User:Savh for reverting the vandal. And yup, they reveal my age, so hope your respect towards me has not fallen off the cliff ;) - Anyways, do you have any ideas to prevent these users? I am guessing this is from my school. Because no other vandal would know my age. --Golden _{burg 111} 20:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi Tegel-- I just created a page for Matomy Media, and while I was re-logging in (session expired)--you deleted it. It says spambots, but it was written and created by me, not a bot.

Sorry that last post seems to have gone where it shouldn't --hoping this formats it correctly. It has been some time since I last worked with wikis. I wrote and created the page for Matomy Media that you deleted. I had to log back in since my session was expired, and you marked it as spambots...which it is not. Can I add it back? Denisegabbard (talk) 14:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)DenisegabbardReply

The deletion reason say "Bot/spambot/promotional page". It's one deletion reason for all these reasons. In this case I chose between "promotional page" or "Out of project scope". Both these reasons are valid for the page that you created. Read Meta:Inclusion policy for more information. If you want to create an article about a company that is considered noticeable enough, that article goes on Wikipedia, not Meta. -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi Tegel, could you help rename me globally to "Graphium"? I think it would be far too tedious to go to every single project listed here to ask for rename. Thanks. --Arctic Kangaroo (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

I have requested for rename personally at Commons and mswiki, where I'm more active at the moment. Please do not rename me on enwiki yet as I'm blocked and would not like to confuse ArbCom and (mainly) the community when I request unblock or return in future. That I would settle when I'm unblocked, also as a "fresh start". --Arctic Kangaroo (talk) 17:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

FYI, stewards cannot currently rename on wikis with local bureaucrats. See SRUC for information on what we can do. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Ok...I think I will wait for the SUL finalisation. Hopefully it does not take too long... --Arctic Kangaroo (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

If my username is only changed on certain wikis, including Commons, then would it jeopardise the replacement part of the file moves? Some of them require my account on another wiki, which most likely is still "Arctic Kangaroo", to replace old file names with new ones. BTW please help to rename me here on Meta. Thanks! Arctic Kangaroo (talk) 04:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

If you rename your account on one wiki that account is by it's own. There is no connection to your accounts with the old name. So if some wikis have requirements that you also have edits on other wikis that can be a problem. Specially since you're blocked on your home wiki where you have the majority of your edits. But that is up to that wiki to decide if it's a problem or not. So you have to ask on Commons if that will have any effect on your permissions. For changing your user name here on Meta you place a request on Meta:Changing username. -- Tegel _(Talk) 12:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for the info Tegel. --Arctic Kangaroo (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

No problem. Just bear in mind that renaming your account is not a way to get around your block on enwp. -- Tegel _(Talk) 13:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

OK, Why did you publicly notified me? --Kolega2357 (talk) 16:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Why not? Was it suppose to be a secret? -- Tegel _(Talk) 16:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

It is not necessary to be a secret. --Kolega2357 (talk) 16:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Categories&oldid=8437718&diff=prev - edit conflict. --Golden _{burg 111} 19:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hi there i just made a page vampire love music video and suddenly it got deleted.Why is that? Thank you— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vampire Love Music Video (talk)

I deleted it as being promotional material. -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Since this is the wrong place for my song can you please delete my wikimedia account ? Thank you and have a nice day

Sorry to say, but it is not possible to delete an account. -- Tegel _(Talk) 19:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Dear Tegel , I feel the need to apologize to you for any misunderstandings that you had been expiriencing in the past at the Macedonian wikipedia. With special respect for you and best wishes, Friend, RM.

Thanks. And who are you? And what misunderstandings? -- Tegel _(Talk) 23:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Dear Tegel, I can not reveal my identity. I just wanted to tell you that you are welcome at Macedonian wikipedia and in Macedonia. Unfortunately, we will not have further contacts. My best regards!-Counterintelligence (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

OK. If you are familiar to the wiki-community, and I think that you have made some contributions before, why do you remove your signature? -- Tegel _(Talk) 23:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Dear Tegel, I am very sorry that we can not continue our conversation. Again I am sorry for any misunderstandings. I saw on mk.wiki some dubious suggestions (such as State enemy etc.). You can find them yourself. Well, now I am convinced that these opinions do not have any grounds. My apologies again. Sincerely yours, -Counterintelligence (talk) 23:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

P.S. Sorry that we will not have further communication.

Dear Tegel, you may hide or archive all conversation relating to the apology. Best Wishes!

--Игор Р. Јанев (talk) 00:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Thanks. It will be archived in due time. -- Tegel _(Talk) 10:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

I DONT NEED NO RELIABLE SOURCE, ITS THE TRUTH, ITS 2014 AND YOU HAVE YET TO PROVE ME WRONG, YES I WORK FOR APPLE HOWEVER THAT IS STILL NO EXCUSE TO REVERT MY CORRECT GRAMATICAL CHANGES.

Can we keep the discussion where it started, on your talk page on en.wikibook? -- Tegel _(Talk) 19:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Sorry, I can't point to much guidelines on meta other than good sense. I am afraid that some users are treating metawiki not as the collaborative environment that it was meant. I am sure that you and the other colleagues will be of help in making - as usual - the best choices. Thank you, M/ (talk) 14:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

The thing is that there is no guidelines about this. Ottava Rima brings the way of working from enwiki when it comes to talk pages. If I would enforce the way of working from svwiki he would be blocked by now. -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Anyway he seems to be complaining for a block of mine. If you review that, I'd be happy with your decision. --M/ (talk) 14:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

There is nothing on sv.wiki that would result in me being blocked. However, there are multiple policies that would result in M7 being blocked. He clearly called someone racist and blocked the individual when there was no racist comment and he was involved. No Wiki allows that to happen. I am already talking to two stewards on mIRC about M7's strange behavior and his willingness to disregard our norms on Meta. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Removing other users comments from your talk page after been told not to do so might get you blocked on svwiki. It's considered the same as comments on article talk pages. I know that enwiki works different, and the problem is that everyone bring their own way of working to Meta and think that it works the same way on all wikis.

The block is made by a Meta admin, so I don't know what a Steward can do. I don't see a need for emergency desysop. -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

I've asked around, and no one backs up your claims about sv.wiki. It would be absurd to make such a claims, especially with archiving. User pages universally are treated as the domain of the user, and people are startled by your comments. You need to provide hard proof of what you are saying. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tegel&oldid=8649068"