User talk:Philippe
edit |
Archive |
---|
Archives |
Leave messages here
Hi Philippe,
I added an easy edit link to Template:Advocacy as I imagine more links will be added to it. Is there a particular category that the pages can suitably go in too?
The Helpful One 02:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
- I don't have one, but it sure seems to make sense. Maybe [[Category:Advocacy]]? --Philippe 02:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
- Yep sure, per KISS. Also, for future, to link to a Category without putting the page in the Category, put a colon before Category, so Category:Advocacy - see this page's source for the example. :) The Helpful One 02:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
- Yeah, I know, but I was just itching to use nowiki. :P --Philippe 02:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
- I have no doubt about that - I get the urge to use it from time to time too ;) The Helpful One 02:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
- Yeah, I know, but I was just itching to use nowiki. :P --Philippe 02:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
- Yep sure, per KISS. Also, for future, to link to a Category without putting the page in the Category, put a colon before Category, so Category:Advocacy - see this page's source for the example. :) The Helpful One 02:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Reply
On reactions
I would like to say, in my capacity as a human being, that I think you had a good comment here. Reminds me of a saying that goes something like "Life is 10% of what happens to you and 90% of how you react to it." Killiondude (talk) 01:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Reply
- Thank you, Killiondude. That means a lot. --Philippe (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Reply
RfA
Every single word you ́ve wrote, has explained how I felt in the situation. But, instead to turn away, I ́ve overreacted. The point is no longer if the block was in place, but that I was involved and didn ́t saw it that way. But as someone wrote above in the RfA, there are much policies missing on meta which could help in such cases. Thanks for your words and sorry that I disappointed you and the community. --WizardOfOz talk 19:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Reply
Notice of review of adminship
Hello,
In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2012. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 08, 2012. Kind regards, —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 12:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Reply
I emailed you and I think it is rather important/urgent. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Reply
Reply
I replied to your question --Gue rillero 23:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC) Reply
Hello Philippe. This is to notify you that you have email waiting from User:BarkingFish. BarkingFish (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Reply