Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/~riley

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Ainz Ooal Gown (talk | contribs) at 22:24, 10 February 2020 (Voted yes). It may differ significantly from the current version .
[画像:Warning]

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, es-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi everyone, I'm Riley and I have been editing for 8 years. My homewikis are Meta, where I am an sysop as of late, and Commons where I have been a sysop since 2016. As a SWMT member, my area of expertise and consistent activity is countervandalism. Currently, I use global rollback/global sysop permissions to fight vandalism, spam & long-term abuse. I am active on IRC which I view as a important communication tool for stewards to handle time-sensitive requests.

    I speak English but am functional in French and Spanish. Through my time on Commons, I have become comfortable helping editors that speak many different languages as it is a diverse multi-lingual project. When I am not helping on Meta & smaller wikis, I can be found writing content on the English Wikipedia, helping out with autoblocked users/verifying permissions on OTRS and creating accounts with the Account Creations team. Working with OTRS & ACC has taught me the impacts of collateral damage from blocks and this has helped me develop sound judgement when placing blocks. Between my Commons and SWMT experience, I have a well-balanced perspective of the challenges both small and large projects face.

    My primary focus as a steward, after finding an experienced mentor, would be to devote my time in the areas of greatest need and familiarity which I believe to be on IRC at #wikimedia-stewards (vandalism/LTAs), the stewards OTRS queue and steward noticeboards (global [b]lock requests, permissions, etc)

    Admittedly, I have only recently been given the global sysop permissions, however, I view this as a bonus as it appears I will be the only global sysop running for steward this year. Note: now one other GS running this year. ~riley (talk ) 09:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

    Thank you for your consideration, I hope you can place your trust in me. ~riley (talk ) 08:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

    Disclosure: I recently returned to activity after having life altering events over the years that restricted my ability to edit. These life events are long behind me and my activity has been incredibly strong since then. I am committed to maintaining my activity and hope you will give me the chance to prove I will be an active steward. ~riley (talk ) 06:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#~riley
English: You are not eligible to vote. More information


Yes(追記) (追記ここまで)

  1. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  trusted and good work--𐐎ikiBayer 👤💬 14:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  CptViraj (📧) 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. 4nn1l2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  4nn1l2 (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. Rowingbohe (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  --Rowingbohe♬ (Talk/My work) 14:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Taivo (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Good candidate overall, despite some concerns with activity. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  I get the activity concern but I like their work and I overall consider the candidate trustworthy competent and suitable Kostas20142 (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Huji (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Huji (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. そらたこ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Soratako🐙 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Good judgement and interaction with them. I think they have a clue on what stewardship entails. As of the too soon progression, their answer to my question allayed my fears. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  When this candidature popped up, I somewhat expected opposition about their activity and tenure. The candidate has sufficient experience in crosswiki affairs, and most importantly, they have good understanding of global policies and steward affairs. Their answers to questions reflect their competence and understanding of policies. I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Hence, I'm supportive of their promotion. Jianhui67 talk ★contribs 15:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. JackPotte (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  JackPotte (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. Sänger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 17:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  It might a bit soon after the promotion as global sysop, but I'm not worried: I'm sure he'll become a useful steward, if elected. Trijnstel talk 17:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  No hesitation. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Ankry (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. Alex Noble (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Possibly a bit too soon, but good answers to questions, and from Commons interactions appear to have a clue. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 20:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. Hasley (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Sgd. Hasley 20:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Vogone (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Mirer (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Joalpe (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. Chicocvenancio (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Chico Venancio (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  per Ajraddatz, Trijnstel et al Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. Aron Manning (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  His heart is in the right place. That's more beneficial than years of experience. —AronM 🍂 edits🌾 00:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  To me, you are an eager candidate who has quickly risen through the ranks, and that's fine by me. On paper, you seem fine as well. While I did not like your non-answer to my difficult questions, your other answers were reasonable, and hence you pass the test. (Also in future, do note that just saying 2+2 = 3 does not imply that I am giving them a math test) Leaderboard (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  29. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Hiàn (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  30. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  31. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by Minorax)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Eatcha (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  32. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  33. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Competent and finest candidate. Really very helpful and worth giving this year a try. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  34. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Gampe (talk) 07:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  35. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  36. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Vituzzu (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  37. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  MZaplotnik (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  38. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) • Minoo (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  39. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Will do fine. Wutsje (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  40. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  41. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Rather a good steward who is sometimes inactive than no steward. Natuur12 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  42. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  43. LPS and MLP Fan (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  This user has the experience necessary to be a steward. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 23:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  44. 蟲蟲飛 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡°C ※(注記)Talk 03:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  45. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Gharouni 04:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  46. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  First, I feel contentment of the replication. I really support that. I think Riley will be a brilliant steward. --Wright Streetdeck 04:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  47. Effeietsanders (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Effeietsanders (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  48. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  I think he was very good people--SickManWP (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  49. Authueil (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Authueil (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  50. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Udo T. (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  51. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Per Ajraddatz. — Jules Talk 12:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  52. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  53. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Veracious (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  54. Ranjithsiji (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  55. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Dolotta (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  56. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  57. Ahmad252 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Ahmad talk 17:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  58. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Fenikals (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  59. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  ok La coince (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  60. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Waddie96 (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  61. Janbery (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  janbery (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  62. Sk4mp (Verification pending) •  Helpful, pleasant, trusted, and wanting to work. You can always become more active, that's not a problem. – Sk4mp talk 21:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  63. Cybularny (Verification pending) •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  64. Masumrezarock100 (Verification pending) •  I am afraid I will never understand why some people are citing the assignment date of GS rights as a reason for opposing. Having GS is a proof of trust and experience. I am pretty sure there are some people with just GR applying for Stewardship this year. Would you have preferred if he applied for Stewardship without having GS right? As for inactivity concerns, we all have real life and I don't think anyone should be as active as if Wikimedia is like real life to them. I would rather have more stewards working together instead of having a handful of active ones. This can prevent wearing them out. He has been active enough over the past few months, so I don't see that as a reason for oppose. At the start of the next year, he can always be stripped off his rights after the confirmation process if the community thinks he has been inactive enough to have his rights removed. As for this, we all make mistakes. See what is good about him instead of assuming the worst. He has proven that he can learn and improve himself. He has plenty of existing Stewards near him who can mentor him and show him around. So I see no reason to hung up about that. Masum Reza 📞 22:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

No(追記) (追記ここまで)

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Oppose. Would be a support if it weren't for the very inconsistent activity over the last year: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/~riley https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/commons.wikimedia/~riley Inactivity among stewards is already a problem and I can't justify potentially adding to it. Would reconsider after a year of sustained activity. Rs chen 7754 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Per Rschen7754, not be active on one of your main wikis might be a problem. 5LZ 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Like him a lot, but agree with Rschen that I would prefer more activity before being a steward. Sorry. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Regretfully oppose as per above, more activity would be better. Sorry. Minorax (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Lack of activity, too quick from GS to Steward. Wait a bit longer and increase activity and try next year. RhinosF1 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  per Tony.--Turkmen talk 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  KPFC 💬 15:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Seems like the candidates heart is in the right place but I can't support the rapid jump from GS to Steward and I share concerns about activity level and experience, specifically recent experience. things like this also concern me, as it shows quite a lot of over-eagerness and very little forethought. Praxidicae (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Global sysop since less than a month ago. More time in this function is required before pursuing another. Érico (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  per Tony stwalkerster (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Having high activity for a considerable amount of time is something I look for. Esteban16 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. 1989 (Eligible, checked by Minorax)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  1989 (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. Arthur Crbz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Je pense que cet utilisateur n'a pas l'expérience requise (pour le moment) pour disposer de ces outils. Peut-être attendre quelques années de plus. Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Unfortunately the lack of recent activity is a problem. ST47 (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. Šedrvan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Šedrvan (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. Malatrad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Per Rschen. Malatrad (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

Neutral(追記) (追記ここまで)

  1. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  User:-revi/SEV; This one is an exception to my rule - while ~riley qualify for my criteria, I think running for Steward at the same day when you got the GS bit is too hasty to me. — regards, Revi 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Although my interactions with them had been net positive but it looks like bit early as revi explained. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  I agree with many other people, especially with an inconsistent activity, one more year of experience with flags is probably better. I would have probably been more tolerant with a stronger language knowledge, but in general I fell more cautious this year. Good luck in any case. Alexmar983 (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Per -revi. --Stïnger (会話) 18:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Sintakso (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Armbrust (talk) 03:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. AshokChakra (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Ashok Talk 09:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Similar to Alexmar, spend some more time with the global sysop tool and try again next year. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Mini apolis 16:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Gereon K. (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Linedwell [talk] 19:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)(削除) 2020 (削除ここまで) •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /