User talk:Sannita

--Slade ♠ 03:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Reply

Hi, thanks for participating in the RFC for interproject links. There is a new option that might be interesting to explore. Please check Dropdown next to title 1 and Dropdown next to title 2. They are part of Option 5.--Micru (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Reply

Hey Sannita, I have a bit of a request to ask from you. We pulled down our banners nearly a fortnight ago for what was a highly successful international fundraiser and brought the curtain down on last years fundraiser. This week however we will be changing payment processors and during the testing of the new system it would be useful to use the time productively on on testing banner text.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to help us improve our italian text using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.

We are going to run the test on tuesday so if you dont see this message till 24 hours after it was sent you can ignore me :) Many Thanks though.

Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Reply

Hi, I've just flagged and approved your bot per your RfBF. Please keep in mind that new tasks need a new approval, if you want to expand its scope. Have fun, -Barras talk 13:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Reply

Thank you for the help with organizing Meta. You may be interested in Meta:MetaProject to Overhaul Meta. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Reply

Is this really a bot edit: [1]? How do you automatically decide if it has meaning or not? Is it semi-automated? PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Reply

Hi Sannita. This category might be empty now, but are you sure it will stay empty? (I changed a few deletion requests in redirects btw) Regards, Trijnstel _talk 11:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC) Reply

Hello Sannita. Your synchbot request is awaiting your response. :) —Pathoschild 16:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sannita, I have just noticed that you've been working on the translation of Tech News today.

I wanted to ask you to consider refraining from translating such pages to avoid supporting the recent actions of the Wikimedia Foundation. On 11 August, they have implemented a change that gives them an unprecedented, unilateral and unlimited power to protect certain pages on Wikimedia wikis in a manner that makes it impossible for all volunteers — including locally elected administrators — to edit them.

The change was secretly forced through without any community consultation, and the Foundation have used this new feature to actively fight the volunteer community of the German Wikipedia.

Your volunteer translations directly sustain such actions of the Foundation. Your work helps them save time and effort that they would otherwise have to invest in recruiting, training and managing new employees, and saves them money they would otherwise have to spend on professional translations.

The recent actions of the Wikimedia Foundation make it very clear that they no longer respect the wishes of the volunteer community, and that they no longer consider us an equal partner. The least we can do to voice our dismay at those actions, and to support our colleagues on the German Wikipedia, is to stop investing our precious time as volunteers on directly helping the Wikimedia Foundation. We can instead translate pages which help all wiki users.

Please take a minute to consider withdrawing your help for the Foundation in protest against their disrespectful treatment of the volunteer community of the German Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and your consideration! odder (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Reply

The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.

If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on change.org.

• Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer
• Letter on change.org

I'm notifying you because you participated in one of several relevant discussions. -Pete F (talk) 22:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hello Sannita. I deleted your local user pages on all wikis as you requested via Synchbot. You can see the full log on your archive page. :) —Pathoschild 23:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for adding multiple new translations in your language here at Meta-Wiki in recent years. Please join the discussion with your opinion: Should FuzzyBot automatically remove all potentially outdated translations? . Nemo (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) Reply

Forse ti interessa rispondere a [2]. Nemo 07:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC) Reply

Dear Sannita,

Four years ago you've used your bot to make my project page more accessible. Thanks a lot for doing so!

As I'm mostly active in other WM projects, I only came across your contribution this afternoon. I've expanded it as I saw fit. Please help me understand whether Grandma Stories (or Oral Citations) really falls under the definition of a sister project. I mean, we have no intention to fork another type of open repository, but to enrich the existing ones (mostly Commons and Wikisource) and eventually its user base (mostly Wikipedia and Wikiversity). What do you think? Thanks, ליאור • Lior (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Reply