User talk:Savh

Feel free to leave me a message here. Alternatively, you can e-mail me.

Hi please delete this as Author request. It a wrong redirect of my talk page archive (error when rename Archives to Archives 2014) Thank in advance --Grind24 (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

Done. Thank you for the wishes above, though you'd probably better attribute the image you used to its original author or it might be deleted on Commons. Best wishes for 2015 to you too, Sa vh ^ñ 01:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

Thank you very much Dear friend .With my best regards :) --Grind24 (talk) 01:17, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

"BetaWikiversity" Hello can you please add to my betawikiversity account the Ip block exempt? I cannot normally publish, I had made a request to a local sysop but I didn't have an answer since. Teles had told me to wait to see if I will have an answer but since nothing. Can you do something? --Grind24 (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

Any local admin should be able to give you that right, we can't since they're active. Sa vh ^ñ 13:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

Thanks Savh to help me to usurp my user name from روخو to Khaled but the problem is that how about my contribution using the old account. can't I have them transfers to my new account. Please help me with that. thanks. --Khaled (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hola Savh, quiero comentarte algo que me ha pasado en varias ocasiones y que me tiene un poco preocupado, aunque parece que últimamente ha cesado. Lo que me ha pasado es que me han bloqueado varias veces por error, éste es un ejemplo, y éste otro. Generalmente el autor del bloqueo se ha dado cuenta pronto del error y me ha desbloqueado, otras veces he avisado yo; puede ser también que me hayan bloqueado más veces y no me haya dado cuenta. A raíz de ésto encargué páginas de usuario en todas las wikis, espero que esto ayude. Mi consulta es sobre qué crees que puede haber motivado los bloqueos y si crees que puedo tomar alguna medida más, aparte de las páginas de usuario, para intentar prevenirlos. También me gustaría saber si puedo solicitar que se eliminen esos registros de bloqueo. Un saludo.--Syum90 (talk) 11:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

There are some admins which are blocking by default, stewards are meant to police this and take action when people mention, especially if people mention conflict of interest whilst trying to get unblocked.

No, stewards are not meant to police all wikis. En.wiki has sufficient conflict resolution processes to handle it, so per the steward policy, it should be handled there. Sa vh ^ñ 12:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

you are assuming arbcom is working and assuming the admins act correctly, these failing are obvious to everyone dont undo without engaging with talk, I am raising serious issues here

You have been told before these issues should be adressed at en.wiki. Even if being unkind was a serious issue, it should be attended locally, independently of how many times you request it on Steward requests/Global. We will not interfere, as you've been told before. This is not a supreme court or something, we are not reviewing en.wiki admins. Sa vh ^ñ 11:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

I prefer to keep user Event and delete EvenT.--Event (talk) 08:17, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

I wasn't aware you owned both accounts. My apologies. Sa vh ^ñ 21:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hola Savh, te he enviado un correo. Saludos.--Syum90 (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hola de nuevo, creo que esto es lo que estaba buscando, me lo leeré atentamente. Por cierto, creo que has obtenido un "cierto apoyo" en tu confirmación, felicidades :-) Un saludo.--Syum90 (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hello, good evening, I'm an IP of the accoun ElreydeEspana, I would ask me unlock my account ElReydeEspana please, and please, let me ask my formal unlocking, promise not to make any vandalism or harass anyone, thanks and have a nice day--190.149.80.170 02:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Reply

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum(_AT_)wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

I do not understand the concern here. What sysop's judgement would the bot be overruling by redirecting redirects from redirects to articles? -- とある白い猫 ^chi? 15:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Reply

If a page is protected as [edit=sysop], editing is a sysop action, even if uncontroversial. There are two main possibilities for a redirect to be protected as such: Either there is a specific reason for it to be protected (and in that case it could be that a bot edit is undesired) or because the original page (moved twice) is/was protected as [edit=sysop]. in the second case, the protection is most likely unnecessary and should not be bypassed by editprotected but notified to the local admins, who can evaluate. Sa vh ^ñ 08:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Reply

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that OTRS volunteers sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have been identified as an OTRS volunteer and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access. OTRS volunteers have a specific agreement available, if you have recently signed the general confidentiality agreement for another role (such as CheckUser or Oversight), you do not need to sign the general agreement again, but you will still need to sign the OTRS agreement.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum(_AT_)wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your OTRS access. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help Reply

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015, you will lose your access to nonpublic information.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum(_AT_)wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 08:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help Reply

FYI. --Gutza (talk) 20:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Reply