Stewards/confirm/2010/Dungodung

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

• Excellent steward. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• we need him --Jan eissfeldt 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Brilliant steward. Katerenka (d) 00:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• confirm. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Aces in my book. Reconfirm. ++Lar: t/c 01:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• We need more technically aware stewards like Dungodung, not fewer. Kylu 02:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep, advanced steward. —Innv {ru-ws} 05:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
• I guess he can stay ;) James (T C) 06:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Christian Giersing 07:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Technical knowledge; good steward work. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• keep MoiraMoira 07:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --Taichi - (あ!) 07:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. --Bsadowski1 08:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Confirm. Tiptoety ^talk 08:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep, of course. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 08:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --WizardOfOz ^talk 10:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Good work, knows what he does. –Ejs-80 10:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• reconfirm. -Barras ^talk 11:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Good steward, confirm --Church of emacs talk 12:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• we Support Support him! :)--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 12:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep. ChristianH 13:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Confirm. --Erwin 13:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi ^◥ 14:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• OK. Marcus Cyron 17:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• One of the most friendly steward , always helpful , always kind , happy to have such good friend --Mardetanha ^talk 17:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep.--Jusjih 04:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep for sure --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. Obelix 11:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Razor flame 22:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• (削除) Delete - Non-notable. bastique ^demandez! 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC) (削除ここまで) Keep Keep OTRS permissions received. bastique ^demandez! 19:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --Jyothis 16:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• keep without a shadow of a doubt oscar 00:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Oppose Oppose Per reasons given on 2009 voting (by me, Synergy, NuclearWarfare, Alefbe). Dungodung's reaction was rude [1] (naming someone as "troll" just like that). This is not "always kind". I also don't like his running of CU tools (done after voting on Stewards/confirm/2009) on a recquest by a person that didn't ask the community for the opinion [2]. Dungodung reacted in less than half hour [3], without asking the requester "Do you have community consensus?". Kubura 04:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• supported by --Sargoth 09:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep -- ※(注記) JéRRy ┼ 雨雨 ※(注記) 16:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep - anyway, there is no need for community consensus when asking for CU, it's not voting. --Dalibor Bosits ^© 17:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  There is a need for community consensus. Meta is strict here [4]. Please, see ection "Pristup alatu za provjeru". " I u ovom slučaju trebate dobiti konsenzus zajednice.". For those who don't understand Croatian [5] "You also need a community consensus (like above)". Kubura 23:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  That section appears, to me, to be referring to local users being given access to the checkuser tool itself rather than stating that consensus is needed to use the tool. Sukida 14:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Confirm, and thanks for serving. Finn Rindahl 00:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• no brainer, keep. billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• confirm, helpful steward --Mercy 21:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• mreow ! mreoooow DarkoNeko 23:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• OK. --Aphaia 01:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Lymantria 12:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• confirm. Xqt 21:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --Vituzzu 18:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep - kind, reliable; excellent steward. --Sanya 19:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep.Teles ^{(talk / pt-wiki talk)} 06:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. The steward. --Millosh 13:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Of course. --micki ^talk 22:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. Yes, good stuff. Cirt (talk) 02:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --EgmontaZ ♤ 19:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --FollowTheMedia 00:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Oppose Oppose remove per the aforementioned incivility. --Caspian blue 16:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  I'm sorry, but what uncivility are you refering to? Calling someone a "troll"? Are you contesting that the said user is definitely not a troll? Thank you. --FiliP ██ 16:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  I refer to Kubura's oppose vote. I don't see any evidence that "the person" Alefbe is warranted to be called a "troll" by you.--Caspian blue 16:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  Have you actually looked? I think I'm allowed to call someone a troll if I think they are. Just like I'd call vandal a vandal. For example, some might disagree that Gregory Khos is a troll, but most of us do agree. Besides, please take a look at their user talk page (or some of their many contributions here on meta) and many complaints there and then tell me whether you really believe the user is benevolent and has good intentions. --FiliP ██ 17:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  The Meta Project is not bound to "one language" nor "one project". We don't know what you know. I don't still see his activities are enough to be called troll by you in my glance at the talk page. Moreover, the page is your confirmation page in 2009, and you should've not reacted like that.[6] That paints your image poorly.--Caspian blue 17:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  OK, that's what you think. You're entitled to an opinion and you've presented it and I respect it. But I don't see anyone else here agreeing with you (except for Kubura). For me, this discussion is over. Have a nice day. Cheers --FiliP ██ 17:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Keep Keep --Stepro 03:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --junafani 23:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Steward confirmations 2010