Talk:Web2Cit/data/ch/rts/www/tests.json: Difference between revisions
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jurbop in topic Item type and publisher
→Item type and publisher: new section
→Item type and publisher: Reply
Line 4:
Line 4:
On the other hand, the "published by" field should be the institution publishing the cited source. Usually this is not used by Wikipedia together with the "published in" field, but in any case, shouldn't it be "RTS" instead of "Ads"? Or "SRG SSR"? What do you think about this? [[User:Diegodlh|Diegodlh]] ([[User talk:Diegodlh|talk]]) 23:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
On the other hand, the "published by" field should be the institution publishing the cited source. Usually this is not used by Wikipedia together with the "published in" field, but in any case, shouldn't it be "RTS" instead of "Ads"? Or "SRG SSR"? What do you think about this? [[User:Diegodlh|Diegodlh]] ([[User talk:Diegodlh|talk]]) 23:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
:Hi @[[User:Diegodlh|Diegodlh]],
:You are right for the [https://www.rts.ch/info/culture/spectacles/12819767-cinq-hommes-du-bon-theatre-en-chantier.html rts article]. The author's article seems to be a journalist at RTS.ch ([https://www.rts.ch/info/culture/spectacles/13509936-casting-quand-le-cirque-rit-avec-le-theatre-sur-le-coup-de-midi.html example]).
:I realize that I did the same error into other broadcast articles. Sorry about that!
:I have no clue about what means "Ads" after the author article name at rts.ch! I thought it was a news agency!
:FYI, in fr-wiki, we have to specify when the linked source is an article of a press agency (like Agence-France-Press [[:en:Category:News_agencies_based_in_France|(AFP) in France]], Reuters,...etc). It is often the case that national newspapers websites publish articles done by their journalists (which is fine) and also articles from press agencies.
:And press agencies articles are usually of less quality than articles written by journalists.
:I have just [[User talk:Escargot rouge|asked Escargot rouge on its talk page]] if he/she can also add "with Afp" when it is the case. (@[[User:Escargot rouge|Escargot rouge]])
:I hope it can be done {{smile}}
:Cheers [[User:Jurbop|Jurbop]] ([[User talk:Jurbop|talk]]) 10:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Revision as of 10:37, 18 November 2022
Item type and publisher
Hi @Jurbop! Thanks again for contributing a test to Web2Cit. I have a question regarding the expected item type you have indicated for path /info/culture/spectacles/12819767-cinq-hommes-du-bon-theatre-en-chantier.html. Although I understand the website belongs to a broadcaster, the cited source is not (as I see it) a TV broadcast, but an article. Maybe a newspaperArticle or a magazineArticle? What do you think?
On the other hand, the "published by" field should be the institution publishing the cited source. Usually this is not used by Wikipedia together with the "published in" field, but in any case, shouldn't it be "RTS" instead of "Ads"? Or "SRG SSR"? What do you think about this? Diegodlh (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Hi @Diegodlh,
- You are right for the rts article. The author's article seems to be a journalist at RTS.ch (example).
- I realize that I did the same error into other broadcast articles. Sorry about that!
- I have no clue about what means "Ads" after the author article name at rts.ch! I thought it was a news agency!
- FYI, in fr-wiki, we have to specify when the linked source is an article of a press agency (like Agence-France-Press (AFP) in France, Reuters,...etc). It is often the case that national newspapers websites publish articles done by their journalists (which is fine) and also articles from press agencies.
- And press agencies articles are usually of less quality than articles written by journalists.
- I have just asked Escargot rouge on its talk page if he/she can also add "with Afp" when it is the case. (@Escargot rouge)
- I hope it can be done
- Cheers Jurbop (talk) 10:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC) Reply
