Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

VisualEditor/Newsletter/2021/June/zh: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Njzjz (talk | contribs)
248 edits
Created page with "你现在可以打开"讨论工具"的测试版本。你得到回复工具后,可于任何时候在Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion改..."
Njzjz (talk | contribs)
248 edits
Created page with "主要结果是:"
Line 7: Line 7:
<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of [[mw:Talk pages project/Replying|the Reply Tool]]. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped [[mw:Talk pages project/Glossary|newer editors]] communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.</span>
<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of [[mw:Talk pages project/Replying|the Reply Tool]]. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped [[mw:Talk pages project/Glossary|newer editors]] communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.</span>


主要结果是:
<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The key results were:</span>


* <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were [https://wikimedia-research.github.io/Reply-tools-analysis-2021/ more likely] to post a comment on a talk page.</span>
* <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were [https://wikimedia-research.github.io/Reply-tools-analysis-2021/ more likely] to post a comment on a talk page.</span>

Revision as of 00:18, 16 June 2021

Editing news 2021 #2

阅读其它语言Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

主要结果是:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

你现在可以打开"讨论工具"的测试版本。你得到回复工具后,可于任何时候在Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion改变参数设置。

Whatamidoing (WMF) (讨论)

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /