Stewards/confirm/2010/Redux: Difference between revisions
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
→Comments about Redux: remove
+ Late statement
Line 21:
Line 21:
|lang = en
|lang = en
|languages = '''en'''
|languages = '''en'''
|statement = Yes, I've been inactive for quite some time now. And the reason is because I've had to move since starting a new job, and this job requires quite a lot of traveling. The reason why I had not added a statement until now, something I never skip doing, is somewhat illustrative of my present situation: I have spent the last 3 weeks in Central America, where I had very, very limited access to the internet. Just got back, and found out that the reconfirmation had already started. As for the future, obviously I don't expect to keep this pace for much longer. I should be able to settle down, possibly in Brazil's capital, Brasília, where I'd be able to dedicate more time to Wikimedia, Wikipedia and other projects. But realistically speaking, that should still take one or two months. Being that I would still be able to return to work, I will not resign, since this is voluntary work and being overwhelmed by our jobs is just something that can happen to anyone. I will make no excuses. I am inactive for the time being, and have been inactive in the recent past because I was simply unable to be active. I will come back, provided I am not removed following this reconfirmation.<br>Furthermore, since I see there are already people making remarks concerning my intervention in the previous reconfirmation, I will state right now that my intervention in this reconfirmation will be limited to adding this statement and answering any questions from the community, as long as they are directed to me personally, and not to the Stewards in general. I will not vote, I will not participate in the Stewards discussions regarding the results. If I feel that there is clear consensus to remove me, regardless of what I have just stated and regardless of any answers I may provide over the course of this reconfirmation, I will remove the flag myself -- after the poll closes, as my final execution of community consensus, and not as a resignation. And should this be my last days as a Steward, I will say only that it has been a great experience, and a pleasure to have worked in this capacity. And, of course, thank you for your patience and the trust that has been bestowed upon me over the last few years. [[User:Redux|Redux]] 23:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
|statement = statement here
}}<section end="en" /><!--
}}<section end="en" /><!--
################
################
Revision as of 23:23, 9 February 2010
logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement
English:
- Languages: en
- Personal info: Yes, I've been inactive for quite some time now. And the reason is because I've had to move since starting a new job, and this job requires quite a lot of traveling. The reason why I had not added a statement until now, something I never skip doing, is somewhat illustrative of my present situation: I have spent the last 3 weeks in Central America, where I had very, very limited access to the internet. Just got back, and found out that the reconfirmation had already started. As for the future, obviously I don't expect to keep this pace for much longer. I should be able to settle down, possibly in Brazil's capital, Brasília, where I'd be able to dedicate more time to Wikimedia, Wikipedia and other projects. But realistically speaking, that should still take one or two months. Being that I would still be able to return to work, I will not resign, since this is voluntary work and being overwhelmed by our jobs is just something that can happen to anyone. I will make no excuses. I am inactive for the time being, and have been inactive in the recent past because I was simply unable to be active. I will come back, provided I am not removed following this reconfirmation.
Furthermore, since I see there are already people making remarks concerning my intervention in the previous reconfirmation, I will state right now that my intervention in this reconfirmation will be limited to adding this statement and answering any questions from the community, as long as they are directed to me personally, and not to the Stewards in general. I will not vote, I will not participate in the Stewards discussions regarding the results. If I feel that there is clear consensus to remove me, regardless of what I have just stated and regardless of any answers I may provide over the course of this reconfirmation, I will remove the flag myself -- after the poll closes, as my final execution of community consensus, and not as a resignation. And should this be my last days as a Steward, I will say only that it has been a great experience, and a pleasure to have worked in this capacity. And, of course, thank you for your patience and the trust that has been bestowed upon me over the last few years. Redux 23:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
русский:
- Языки: en
- Личная информация: здесь должно быть заявление
Comments about Redux
- Not anylonger active, no statement, sorry. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- basically inactive, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- As above... — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- If indeed inactive, don't confirm Seb az86556 01:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remorseful remove as inactive. Kylu 02:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive; no statement - remove. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive. --WizardOfOz talk 10:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive. Doesn't need the tools -> remove. -Barras talk 12:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hardly any activity and no statement, so I'm afraid I must say remove. --Erwin 13:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- inactive - so adios! We have too little active Stewarts but so much users think beacuase of Stewards like you we have enough. Marcus Cyron 17:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- sorry but remove , on the ground of inactivity --Mardetanha talk 18:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Basically inactive. Rights are granted for the benefit of the community, when they ceased to be used to any degree they can be removed --Herby talk thyme 09:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- very low activity, weak not-reconfirm --FiliP ██ 11:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive, remove. Razor flame 07:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remove. Last 50 edits stretch back to his attempts at last year's confirmations to convince us inactivity is not a good reason to strip people of access. —Anonymous Dissident Talk 13:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]