Talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 86.138.52.77
...
It is a Friday night after all.
Line 1:
Line 1:
I recommend collapsing the No Original Research policy on Wikipedia. It has no real benefits and serves only to restrict users. I remember people used to have a relaxed attitude to NOR on Wikipedia. It was thought of more as a guideline than a rule. People would bear it in mind but disregard it if it was diminishing the quality of an article and it was only nutter deletionists who treated it like gospel. I also think POV, Synthesis, Notability and most importantly Verifiability, not Truth should be dissolved. --[[Special:Contributions/86.138.52.77|86.138.52.77]] 21:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I recommend collapsing the No Original Research policy on Wikipedia. It has no real benefits and serves only to restrict users. I remember people used to have a relaxed attitude to NOR on Wikipedia. It was thought of more as a guideline than a rule. People would bear it in mind but disregard it if it was diminishing the quality of an article and it was only nutter deletionists who treated it like gospel. I also think POV, Synthesis, Notability and most importantly Verifiability, not Truth should be dissolved. --[[Special:Contributions/86.138.52.77|86.138.52.77]] 21:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
:Um, no. Not even the slightest chance. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
:Um, no. Not even the slightest chance. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I'd like you to ignore my last comment. I was inebriated when I posted it. --[[Special:Contributions/86.138.52.77|86.138.52.77]] 01:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Revision as of 01:09, 1 August 2009
I recommend collapsing the No Original Research policy on Wikipedia. It has no real benefits and serves only to restrict users. I remember people used to have a relaxed attitude to NOR on Wikipedia. It was thought of more as a guideline than a rule. People would bear it in mind but disregard it if it was diminishing the quality of an article and it was only nutter deletionists who treated it like gospel. I also think POV, Synthesis, Notability and most importantly Verifiability, not Truth should be dissolved. --86.138.52.77 21:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Um, no. Not even the slightest chance. J.delanoy gabs adds 21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Reply
I'd like you to ignore my last comment. I was inebriated when I posted it. --86.138.52.77 01:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Reply