Stewards/confirm/2009/Sj: Difference between revisions
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
→Comments about Sj: remove
→Comments about Sj: remove
Line 30:
Line 30:
* COI I'm also up for confirmation. I've met SJ at Wikimanias and meetups. He is a nice guy and really dedicated to our mission. But no statement and no actions in the last year does satisfy our definition of inactivity. If he comes back during the next election cycle, then I will vote for him. --[[User:Mav|Daniel Mayer (mav)]] 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
* COI I'm also up for confirmation. I've met SJ at Wikimanias and meetups. He is a nice guy and really dedicated to our mission. But no statement and no actions in the last year does satisfy our definition of inactivity. If he comes back during the next election cycle, then I will vote for him. --[[User:Mav|Daniel Mayer (mav)]] 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
* No steward edits for over a year? Remove. [[User:Thehelpfulone|<font color="red">'''The'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color="black"> '''Helpful'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulone|<font color="red"> '''One'''</font>]] 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
* No steward edits for over a year? Remove. [[User:Thehelpfulone|<font color="red">'''The'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color="black"> '''Helpful'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulone|<font color="red"> '''One'''</font>]] 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
* These positions ''really'' should [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm&diff=prev&oldid=771689#Sj not be a gold watch] and I feel that SJ came close to abusing our trust (although he was probably just being unrealistic with himself) by saying he'd make an effort to be more active. Thanks for all you've done and there's no shame in becoming inactive. But it's now more than a year past time to remove. --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 04:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Revision as of 04:15, 2 February 2009
logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement, template
English:
- Languages: en, de-2, es-2, fr-2
- Personal info: statement here
Comments about Sj
- Sj made no steward actions at all in 2008. That's not active enough in my book really. And the past 50 rights go back to June 2006. Majorly talk 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- Agreed - clearly inactive. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive, remove. --APPER 01:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- Same opinion. Marcus Cyron 01:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- Inactive, remove. Prodego talk 03:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- Remove, per Majorly. --Brownout (msg) 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- COI I'm also up for confirmation. I've met SJ at Wikimanias and meetups. He is a nice guy and really dedicated to our mission. But no statement and no actions in the last year does satisfy our definition of inactivity. If he comes back during the next election cycle, then I will vote for him. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- No steward edits for over a year? Remove. The Helpful One 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
- These positions really should not be a gold watch and I feel that SJ came close to abusing our trust (although he was probably just being unrealistic with himself) by saying he'd make an effort to be more active. Thanks for all you've done and there's no shame in becoming inactive. But it's now more than a year past time to remove. --JayHenry 04:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]