Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?

To: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Subject: Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
From: Jean-Yves Migeon <jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost>
Date: 2011年11月03日 22:28:10 +0100

On 03.11.2011 18:53, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:

Can't dd_snprintf() be also optional if it occupies ~2.5KiB?

I can; there's one trade off though:
- the SMALLPROG dd(1) becomes smaller (by about 2.2kiB), which is still
approx. 200 bytes bigger than the original SMALLPROG dd(1)
- the normal dd(1) becomes bigger (approx. 600B), as we don't factor
posix/human/quiet summary() anymore.

Forgot to ask -- which way you prefer? I don't mind, personally.
--
Jean-Yves Migeon
jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui

References:
- Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui
- Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon

Prev by Date: Re: Parallel tasking library
Next by Date: Re: Parallel tasking library
Previous by Thread: Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
Next by Thread: Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index