tech-userlevel archive
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Old Index]
Re: humanize_number(3) for dd(1) summary?
> Done. The option is NO_MSGFMT.
>
> Total binary size:
>
> new dd: 29920
> new dd, with SMALLPROG: 24864
> old dd: 26677
> old dd, with SMALLPROG: 22028
:
> @@ -105,6 +108,7 @@ void
> jcl(char **argv)
> {
> struct arg *ap, tmp;
> + //struct dd_msgfmt *fmt;
> char *oper, *arg;
>
> in.dbsz = out.dbsz = 512;
Leftover?
> --- misc.c 5 Oct 2007 07:23:09 -0000 1.21
> +++ misc.c 2 Nov 2011 22:21:55 -0000
:
> +static void
> +posix_summary(void)
> +{
> + char buf[100];
> +
> /* Use snprintf(3) so that we don't reenter stdio(3). */
> - (void)snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> - "%llu+%llu records in\n%llu+%llu records out\n",
> - (unsigned long long)st.in_full, (unsigned long long)st.in_part,
> - (unsigned long long)st.out_full, (unsigned long long)st.out_part);
> + (void)dd_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> + "%I+%i records in\n%O+%o records out\n");
> (void)write(STDERR_FILENO, buf, strlen(buf));
:
> +static int
> +dd_snprintf(char *sbuf, size_t len, const char *fmt)
> +{
:
Can't dd_snprintf() be also optional if it occupies ~2.5KiB?
---
Izumi Tsutsui
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index