On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Devin Jeanpierre <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this thread is probably Python-Ideas territory... > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Allen Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > Currently, this works with explicit line continuation, but as all style > > guides favor implicit line continuation over explicit, it would be nice > > if you could do the following: > > > > with (open('foo') as foo, > > open('bar') as bar, > > open('baz') as baz, > > open('spam') as spam, > > open('eggs') as eggs): > > pass > > The parentheses seem unnecessary/redundant/weird. Why not allow > newlines in-between "with" and the terminating ":"? > > with open('foo') as foo, > open('bar') as bar, > open('baz') as baz: > pass > That way lies Coffeescript. Too much guessing. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com