I think this thread is probably Python-Ideas territory...
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Allen Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> Currently, this works with explicit line continuation, but as all style
> guides favor implicit line continuation over explicit, it would be nice
> if you could do the following:
>
> with (open('foo') as foo,
> open('bar') as bar,
> open('baz') as baz,
> open('spam') as spam,
> open('eggs') as eggs):
> pass
The parentheses seem unnecessary/redundant/weird. Why not allow
newlines in-between "with" and the terminating ":"?
with open('foo') as foo,
open('bar') as bar,
open('baz') as baz:
pass
-- Devin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com