> > That would work, but would be slower for the reference implementation > due to the repeated `isinstance(value, int)` checks. >
If you wanted to avoid that you could use match/case inside the "case int()" instead, i.e.: case int(): match value: case _ if value < 8: // do things case _ if value < 1 << 8: // do things ... case _: // raise some kind of error but that might be madness. > I think the repeated `int()` cases do not help readability. > Which form do you think is more readable? > I think the form I suggested is more readable and also I think it is more PEP622-like and that it is easier to reason about/test/debug/maintain, but that's just my opinion! Not sure how important the speed difference is to this example.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VAKQAJ2BTATMXG2JUKKEO4BTMJDUWGQS/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/