On 2020年4月15日 at 15:41, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > The "hey I'm a dict, but look over hear and now you can treat my like like > any other object" duality doesn't sit well with me. I do understand the idea > of wanting to convert something to convert JSON data into a more object-like > access pattern, though.
I don't like the duality, but I *do* like (in some situations) the object-with-dynamic-attributes style of access. Basically, when access is predominantly via literal strings and heavily nested, obj["element"]["sub"]["another"] is *far* more punctuation-heavy and (IMO) difficult to read as a consequence, than obj.element.sub.another Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RZQG5BIY4KJA5NIONSXOY4OG26ALZ57G/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/