- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 2002年2月18日 16:27:00 +0000
- To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020218162156.04aaca58@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
Ron, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Nov/0119.html you raised an issue which was captured in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-graph as [[[ The RDF Model and Syntax specification does not cover the nature of RDF graphs in its formal model. ]]] As recorded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html the RDFCore WG resolved: the WG resolve that the model theory is a formal description of the properties of an RDF graph and that this issue be closed. The formal definition of an RDF graph does not define a URI for for an RDF graph. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 11:29:01 UTC