- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 2002年2月18日 15:54:25 +0000
- To: dehora@acm.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020218155034.06e92b90@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
Bill, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Dec/0152.html you raised an issue which was captured in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-terminologicus as [[[ Communication and discussion within the community interested in RDF is hampered by lack of a disciplined terminology. It is suggested that a glossary of terms be developed to aid effective communication. This is a general issue for all RDF specifications. ]]] As recorded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html the RDFCore WG resolved: the WG resolves that this issue is addressed by the primer and that this issue be closed. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 10:56:00 UTC