- From: <tarod@softhome.net>
- Date: 2002年2月14日 15:10:43 GMT
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20020214151043.28546.qmail@softhome.net>
Good try but I must say that it's not 100% what I asked for because for the range issue you use Class C A is subClassOf C B is subClassOf C And then c range is C. It's a good aproach but it's not logically correct, you are saying that range of c is (C or A or B) and I asked for range of c should be (A or B) Now try it with the old aproach it's easier. Good luck, Marc Seth Russell writes: > How about this? > > http://robustai.net/mentography/rdfs_domain_range2.gif > > Seth Russell > > ----in response to--- > From: <tarod@softhome.net> > > > Just for playing. > > > > if you followed the mails between Brian McBride and I, you will know > > about the different semantics for range and domain properties. > > > > His proposal is the official, mine is just what I think it should be > > (just me) > > > > So, I wanted to propose to the 'gurus' a little challenge > > > > Try to represent that in rdf schema > > > > Class A > > Class B > > > > property c(range(A or B), domain(A and B)) > > > > using both semantics (disjoint, conjuntion) > > of course you can add as many classes and properties you need and the > > relations between them you need. > > > > Thanks for your time, > > Marc >
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 10:07:56 UTC