- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: 2002年2月14日 06:21:27 -0800
- To: <tarod@softhome.net>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <005e01c1b562$e436bea0657ドルba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
How about this? http://robustai.net/mentography/rdfs_domain_range2.gif Seth Russell ----in response to--- From: <tarod@softhome.net> > Just for playing. > > if you followed the mails between Brian McBride and I, you will know > about the different semantics for range and domain properties. > > His proposal is the official, mine is just what I think it should be > (just me) > > So, I wanted to propose to the 'gurus' a little challenge > > Try to represent that in rdf schema > > Class A > Class B > > property c(range(A or B), domain(A and B)) > > using both semantics (disjoint, conjuntion) > of course you can add as many classes and properties you need and the > relations between them you need. > > Thanks for your time, > Marc
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 09:24:57 UTC