- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 03:02:05 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20060505030205.D1F09BDA7@w3c4.w3.org>
Name: Jason White Email: jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au Affiliation: none Document: W2 Item Number: Success Criterion 2.2.1 Part of Item: Comment Type: ED Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Whereas guideline 2.2 is framed in terms of \"time limits\" on reading and interaction. criterion 2.2.1 instead uses the term \"time-out\". Neither \"time limit\" nor \"time-out\" is defined. This difference in terminology raises the question of whether there is meant to be a distinction between the two concepts. I don\'t think there is, or ought to be, such a distinction. Proposed Change: Use the term \"time limits\" in 2.2.1, in the same sense as in the text of guideline 2.2 itself. More generally, use \"time limit\" wherever \"time-out\" appears in WCAG 2.0. If appropriate, add a glossary entry to clarify the meaning of the term - I think the text of guideline 2.2 is a clear and precise formulation of what is meant.
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 03:02:09 UTC