Posted by Coornail on July 8, 2009 at 10:51am
One content type (with a "publication type" select field)
63% (5 votes)
All separate content types (~35 content type, you can delete, add more)
38% (3 votes)
Total votes: 8
Categories: biblio, bibliography
Comments
Discussions
The discussion about the pros and cons is here.
+1 for ~35 content types
Biblio opened my eyes, but CCK is a more universal and flexible implementation. I think the ability to "delete, add more" content types, Coornail, is ultimately what is needed. David L's suggestions are a good compromise between backward-compatibility and the future -- OK, let's get a CCK maintainer into this discussion.
It might be confusing: If we
It might be confusing: If we will decide with the one content type version, you can still add and remove publication types.
Is the question really
Is the question really between 1 and 35?
Couldn't some of the 35 be consolidated?