Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

chore: improve the NFT comparison article#954

Draft
aigerimu wants to merge 6 commits into
main from
nft-comparison
Draft

chore: improve the NFT comparison article #954
aigerimu wants to merge 6 commits into
main from
nft-comparison

Conversation

@aigerimu

@aigerimu aigerimu commented Oct 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fix #935

@aigerimu aigerimu marked this pull request as draft October 22, 2025 21:47

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the updates across the docs page (standard/tokens/nft/comparison.mdx) and the dependency lockfile. I didn’t find any issues in the diff between main and pr_head; no fixes are needed.

Comment thread standard/tokens/nft/comparison.mdx Outdated
Comment thread standard/tokens/nft/comparison.mdx Outdated

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as resolved.

| ---------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Deployment and minting flow | Creator mints an item. | Any user with a valid proof can deploy an item. |
| Who pays for item deployment | Creators pay in most cases. | Audience pays. |
| Eligibility or allowlist | Creator controls custom off-chain or on-chain logic. | On-chain Merkle allowlist; users verify proofs using root from [Merkle root](/foundations/proofs/overview). |

@skywardboundd skywardboundd Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"users verify proofs using root from", proof is not only from root( it from backend ), may be we can just delete sentence about root.

Royalty defines the percentage of NFT sales paid to the collection creator. It is set at the collection level and available using the `get_royalty_params`. For full specification, refer to [TEP‐66](https://github.com/ton-blockchain/TEPs/blob/1e5b2c4c8290d88d6bc3ddc4729812e3ac232c00/text/0066-nft-royalty-standard.md).

Marketplaces can rely on this model and pay royalties to the collection creator regardless of how the collection was deployed.
Any collection, including cNFT, can implement royalties. Marketplaces automatically pay royalties to the creator, regardless of the collection type.

@skywardboundd skywardboundd Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Marketplaces automatically pay royalties"
Not really, they can pay, but can not to pay

novusnota reacted with thumbs up emoji
- When to use: one-off assets, experimental pieces, or cases where collection-level coordination is unnecessary
- Metadata: stored entirely on the item
- Discoverability: no collection index; external indexers or explicit links are required to surface the item
- Trade-offs: simpler setup but fewer shared features, including no collection-wide royalties or configuration, no batch queries by index.

@skywardboundd skywardboundd Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

may be just "no index", it seems more simpler

@novusnota novusnota changed the title (削除) feat: [Standard > NFT > Comparison] Improve article (削除ここまで) (追記) feat: improve the NFT comparison article (追記ここまで) May 28, 2026
@novusnota novusnota changed the title (削除) feat: improve the NFT comparison article (削除ここまで) (追記) chore: improve the NFT comparison article (追記ここまで) May 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@skywardboundd skywardboundd skywardboundd requested changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[NFT > Comparison] Improve article

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /