Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Sign up
Appearance settings

feat: update ndarray TypeScript declarations #8128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
stdlib-bot wants to merge 1 commit into develop
base: develop
Choose a base branch
Loading
from update-ndarray-declarations

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot commented Sep 22, 2025

This PR updates TypeScript declarations for the @stdlib/ndarray namespace.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Check the scope of the changes (following Conventional Commits):
    • Are these new APIs? Then this is a feat.
    • Are these changes to existing APIs that could break compatibility? Then this is a feat! (i.e., a breaking change).
    • Are these only documentation changes to existing APIs? Then this is docs.
  • Update the PR title to align with the change type (feat, feat!, or docs).
  • Approve the PR once you are confident about the classification and changes made.
 

Signed-off-by: stdlib-bot <82920195+stdlib-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. automated-pr Automated pull request (e.g., from a bot). labels Sep 22, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot requested a review from a team September 22, 2025 14:00
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
ndarray $\color{green}708/708$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}0/0$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}708/708$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Sep 22, 2025

@Planeshifter Should we wait for the namespace reserved keyword workaround before moving this PR forward?
Planeshifter reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Member

@Planeshifter Planeshifter left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blocking until we have updated the generation script to not use reserved keywords.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Planeshifter Planeshifter Planeshifter requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
automated-pr Automated pull request (e.g., from a bot). Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /