Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Sign up
Appearance settings

DATACMNS-1412: Add support for QueryDSL Predicate, Pageable, Sort and ProjectedPayload on WebFlux controllers #2667

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
matiasah wants to merge 7 commits into spring-projects:main
base: main
Choose a base branch
Loading
from matiasah:main

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

@matiasah matiasah commented Jul 26, 2022

This Pull Request does not include tests and is not ready for merge but for reviewing.

#1846

A ProjectingJackson2JsonDecoder is provided for use with @ProjectedPayload and WebFlux.

matiasah reacted with thumbs up emoji
@matiasah matiasah changed the title (削除) Create ProjectingJackson2JsonDecoder.java (削除ここまで) (追記) Add support for QueryDSL, Pageable and Sort on WebFlux (追記ここまで) Jul 29, 2022
@matiasah matiasah changed the title (削除) Add support for QueryDSL, Pageable and Sort on WebFlux (削除ここまで) (追記) Add support for QueryDSL Predicate, Pageable, Sort and ProjectedPayload on WebFlux controllers (追記ここまで) Jul 29, 2022
@matiasah matiasah changed the title (削除) Add support for QueryDSL Predicate, Pageable, Sort and ProjectedPayload on WebFlux controllers (削除ここまで) (追記) DATACMNS-1412: Add support for QueryDSL Predicate, Pageable, Sort and ProjectedPayload on WebFlux controllers (追記ここまで) Jul 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi, beside the tests are there any comments on this?

Copy link

fdbozzo commented Aug 11, 2023

Hi all. I can see that this PR is ready to merge without conflicts since 9 months now. Is there any intention to finally merge it?
There is a lot of peaple waiting for this functionallity.
Thanks.-

@mp911de mp911de force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 0122d1b to 5070a0f Compare August 21, 2023 12:07
Copy link

krojew commented Aug 30, 2023

Is there a possibility for merging?

Copy link

Is it only the unit tests, or are there any other missing components to merge this pull request?

I'd be happy to contribute to making this issue ready to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Labels
status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /