Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Rollup of 4 pull requests #146304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
bors merged 10 commits into rust-lang:master from matthiaskrgr:rollup-69hs07h
Sep 7, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #146304

bors merged 10 commits into rust-lang:master from matthiaskrgr:rollup-69hs07h
Sep 7, 2025

Conversation

Copy link
Member

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr commented Sep 7, 2025
edited by rustbot
Loading

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

kumarUjjawal and others added 10 commits September 4, 2025 00:03
It is always false nowadays. ThinLTO summary writing is instead done by
llvm_optimize.
...crum
fix: offline rustdoc html missing favicon
As discussed in the rust-lang#146149 the doc was missing the favicon icon when build locally and viewed on a browser. I changed the relative path and also now we explicitly copy both SVG and PNG.
<img width="1132" height="425" alt="Screenshot 2025年09月03日 at 11 57 46 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/062cbb08-04ec-4d88-a43a-710fb6190f82" />
Misc LTO cleanups
Follow up to rust-lang#145955.
* Remove want_summary argument from `prepare_thin`.
 Since rust-lang#133250 ThinLTO summary writing is instead done by `llvm_optimize`.
* Two minor cleanups
...mulacrum
feat(std): emulate flock for solaris via fcntl
Upstream Solaris flock emulation to libstd from cargo.
This is borrowed from
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/3b379fcc541b39321a7758552d37e5e0cc4277b9/src/cargo/util/flock.rs#L502-L536 which was implemented by an Oracle employee.
The code has been in cargo since 2022-12.
Python's `fcntl.flock` emulates like this as well: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/c919d02edecfe9d75fe374756fb8aa1db8d95f55/Modules/fcntlmodule.c#L337-L400
We did the same thing in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/0d0f4eac8b98133e5da6d3604d86a8f3b5a67844/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/flock/unix.rs#L13-L39
However, should we just always falls back to fcntl for all Unix, instead of "unsupported"?
try-job: `*-solaris`
...ethlin
Introduce PlaceContext::may_observe_address.
A small utility method to avoid open-coding the logic in several MIR opts.
@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 7, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 7, 2025

📌 Commit 36557d1 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 7, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 7, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 36557d1 with merge 12eb345...

Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 7, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 12eb345 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 7, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 12eb345 into rust-lang:master Sep 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.91.0 milestone Sep 7, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#146170 fix: offline rustdoc html missing favicon d3b4e2ae025c30dcdb26584c56f25c6e4df4948f (link)
#146209 Misc LTO cleanups d2c3e34400e1daf679e47c8eb0c11d78bf6efd00 (link)
#146269 feat(std): emulate flock for solaris via fcntl c9672d1bc94b966bbd08a23f9516e8c3b070b9b2 (link)
#146297 Introduce PlaceContext::may_observe_address. 771aa30927fcea4398ec3d59260a274c77f7a1f4 (link)

previous master: 23718020b1

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2025

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 2371802 (parent) -> 12eb345 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 2 test diffs

2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
 test-dashboard 12eb345e5593a10e61b4aef766076c8bd552fea6 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-apple-various: 4827.5s -> 3630.0s (-24.8%)
  2. dist-x86_64-apple: 8473.4s -> 6653.6s (-21.5%)
  3. pr-check-1: 1368.2s -> 1626.5s (18.9%)
  4. dist-aarch64-apple: 6302.3s -> 7268.1s (15.3%)
  5. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2587.0s -> 2920.8s (12.9%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-1: 3315.0s -> 3715.3s (12.1%)
  7. aarch64-gnu: 6583.1s -> 7336.0s (11.4%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-tools: 3300.2s -> 3663.5s (11.0%)
  9. aarch64-gnu-llvm-19-2: 2245.5s -> 2492.3s (11.0%)
  10. i686-gnu-1: 7348.7s -> 8100.5s (10.2%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (12eb345): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

  • If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
    please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
    @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
  • If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
    a new PR with a fix for the regression.
  • If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
    you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
    were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.1%, 0.4%] 8
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.1%, 0.9%] 13
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7% [-2.9%, -2.5%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.2% [-0.2%, 0.4%] 9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.5%, secondary 1.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.6% [1.3%, 1.8%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.7% [0.7%, 2.3%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.5% [-1.8%, 1.8%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 467.642s -> 468.162s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 387.46 MiB -> 387.46 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Sep 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

perf triage:

Regression looks to be caused by #146297, continuing the discussion there.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.91.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /