-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.7k
Rename ToolRustc to ToolRustcPrivate
#146127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
+71
−63
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jieyouxu is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.
@rustbot
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
labels
Sep 2, 2025
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #146076) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.
jieyouxu
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Sep 3, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. This name does seem much more obvious 😁 One doc nit, but otherwise r=me after a rebase.
@rustbot author
@rustbot
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 3, 2025
@Kobzol
Kobzol
force-pushed
the
rename-tool-rustc
branch
from
September 3, 2025 07:14
f9b1381 to
df5896a
Compare
The rustc-dev-guide subtree was changed. If this PR only touches the dev guide consider submitting a PR directly to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide otherwise thank you for updating the dev guide with your changes.
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.
Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.
@bors r=jieyouxu rollup
@bors
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Sep 3, 2025
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2025
Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate` I think that this name gets the point across much better. r? `@jieyouxu`
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #143725 (core: add Peekable::next_if_map) - #145209 (Stabilize `path_add_extension`) - #145750 (raw_vec.rs: Remove superfluous fn alloc_guard) - #145962 (Ensure we emit an allocator shim when only some crate types need one) - #145963 (Add LSX accelerated implementation for source file analysis) - #146054 (add `#[must_use]` to `array::repeat`) - #146090 (Derive `PartialEq` for `InvisibleOrigin`) - #146120 (Correct typo in `rustc_errors` comment) - #146127 (Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate`) - #146131 (rustdoc-search: add test case for indexing every item type) - #146133 (Revert "Make `lto` and `linker-plugin-lto` work the same for `compiler_builtins`) - #146134 (llvm: nvptx: Layout update to match LLVM) - #146136 (docs(std): add missing closing code block fences in doc comments) - #146137 (Disallow frontmatter in `--cfg` and `--check-cfg` arguments) - #146140 (compiletest: cygwin follows windows in using PATH for dynamic libraries) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2025
Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate` I think that this name gets the point across much better. r? ``@jieyouxu``
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #143725 (core: add Peekable::next_if_map) - #145209 (Stabilize `path_add_extension`) - #145342 (fix drop scope for `super let` bindings within `if let`) - #145750 (raw_vec.rs: Remove superfluous fn alloc_guard) - #145962 (Ensure we emit an allocator shim when only some crate types need one) - #145963 (Add LSX accelerated implementation for source file analysis) - #146054 (add `#[must_use]` to `array::repeat`) - #146090 (Derive `PartialEq` for `InvisibleOrigin`) - #146120 (Correct typo in `rustc_errors` comment) - #146127 (Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate`) - #146133 (Revert "Make `lto` and `linker-plugin-lto` work the same for `compiler_builtins`) - #146134 (llvm: nvptx: Layout update to match LLVM) - #146136 (docs(std): add missing closing code block fences in doc comments) - #146137 (Disallow frontmatter in `--cfg` and `--check-cfg` arguments) - #146140 (compiletest: cygwin follows windows in using PATH for dynamic libraries) - #146156 (miri subtree update) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2025
Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate` I think that this name gets the point across much better. r? ```@jieyouxu```
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2025
Rollup of 24 pull requests Successful merges: - #140459 (Add `read_buf` equivalents for positioned reads) - #143725 (core: add Peekable::next_if_map) - #145209 (Stabilize `path_add_extension`) - #145342 (fix drop scope for `super let` bindings within `if let`) - #145750 (raw_vec.rs: Remove superfluous fn alloc_guard) - #145827 (On unused binding or binding not present in all patterns, suggest potential typo of unit struct/variant or const) - #145932 (Allow `inline(always)` with a target feature behind a unstable feature `target_feature_inline_always`.) - #145962 (Ensure we emit an allocator shim when only some crate types need one) - #145963 (Add LSX accelerated implementation for source file analysis) - #146054 (add `#[must_use]` to `array::repeat`) - #146090 (Derive `PartialEq` for `InvisibleOrigin`) - #146112 (don't uppercase error messages) - #146120 (Correct typo in `rustc_errors` comment) - #146124 (Test `rustc-dev` in `distcheck`) - #146127 (Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate`) - #146131 (rustdoc-search: add test case for indexing every item type) - #146134 (llvm: nvptx: Layout update to match LLVM) - #146136 (docs(std): add missing closing code block fences in doc comments) - #146137 (Disallow frontmatter in `--cfg` and `--check-cfg` arguments) - #146140 (compiletest: cygwin follows windows in using PATH for dynamic libraries) - #146150 (fix(rustdoc): match rustc `--emit` precedence ) - #146155 (Make bootstrap self test parallel) - #146161 ([rustdoc] Uncomment code to add scraped rustdoc examples in loaded paths) - #146172 (triagebot: configure some pings when certain attributes are used) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2025
Rollup merge of #146127 - Kobzol:rename-tool-rustc, r=jieyouxu Rename `ToolRustc` to `ToolRustcPrivate` I think that this name gets the point across much better. r? ````@jieyouxu````
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think that this name gets the point across much better.
r? @jieyouxu