Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Remove named lifetimes in some PartialOrd & PartialEq impls #143575

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
GrigorenkoPV wants to merge 1 commit into rust-lang:master
base: master
Choose a base branch
Loading
from GrigorenkoPV:unused_lifetimes

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

@GrigorenkoPV GrigorenkoPV commented Jul 7, 2025

Makes the docs way easier to look at, gets rid of a few #[allow(unused_lifetimes)], and AFAICT is completely equivalent.

Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 7, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 7, 2025
- impl PartialEq for String;
- impl PartialEq<ByteStr> for String;
- impl PartialEq<ByteString> for String;
- impl PartialEq<str> for String;
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum Jul 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, do we know what caused this change? It seems a bit unexpected for what is (I think) supposed to be a no-op change to change the diagnostic like this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@GrigorenkoPV GrigorenkoPV Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No idea, sadly

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 19, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 25, 2025

Error: Parsing assign command in comment failed: ...'' | error: specify user to assign to at >| ''...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #t-infra on Zulip.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left review comments

Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /