-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.7k
Add regression test for nested replacement ranges in cfg_eval #139286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-review +S-waiting-on-author
@rustbot ready
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just me having a very first glance at this PR and at surrounding context, I'll give this a proper review some other time:
I'm surprised that this test leads to errors (×ばつ "removing an expression is not supported in this position") in nightly-2024年08月15日 which is a few nightlies before PR #128725 (which intro'ed the ICE reported in #129166 (e.g., nightly-2024年09月08日)). Shouldn't it pass in that version to be a proper regression test instead of erroring as in nightly-2024年09月09日?
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready
.
@reez12g
Thanks for your contribution.
Form wg-triage. Could you please take a look comment above
Closes #132727