Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Rollup of 8 pull requests #110880

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 18 commits into rust-lang:master from matthiaskrgr:rollup-elpwf8c

Conversation

Copy link
Member

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr commented Apr 27, 2023

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

WaffleLapkin and others added 18 commits April 25, 2023 17:30
The infra-team is continuously monitoring the efficiency of the build
system in an effort to improve overall build times and resource usage.
The builders for the `i686-gnu` targets have used much less resources
than allocated in the past, so we are testing a smaller builder size for
them.
The infra-team is continuously monitoring the efficiency of the build
system in an effort to improve overall build times and resource usage.
The builder for the `mingw-check` target have used much less resources
than allocated in the past, so we are testing a smaller builder size for
it.
The infra-team is continuously monitoring the efficiency of the build
system in an effort to improve overall build times and resource usage.
The builders for some of the `x86_64-gnu` targets have used much less
resources than allocated in the past, so we are testing a smaller
builder size for them.
Signed-off-by: cui fliter <imcusg@gmail.com>
...mples, r=compiler-errors
docs(style): add more let-else examples
Adding a few more examples for increased clarity based on subsequent discussion that arose after implementation work began.
Will need approval from t-style, but also cc ``@ytmimi`` to make sure these examples don't contradict any examples we've been incorporating as part of the rustfmt implementation
...ilstrieb
Sprinkle some `#[inline]` in `rustc_data_structures::tagged_ptr`
This is based on `nm --demangle (rustc +a --print sysroot)/lib/librustc_driver-*.so | rg CopyTaggedPtr` which shows many methods that should probably be inlined. May fix the regression in rust-lang#110795.
r? ``@Nilstrieb``
..., r=compiler-errors
Migrate `rustc_passes` to translatable diagnostics
cc rust-lang#100717 
...oalbini
Optimize builder sizes
The infra-team is continuously monitoring the efficiency of the CI system in an effort to improve overall build times and resource usage. Some builders have used much less than their allocated resources, so we are testing smaller builder sizes for them.
r? ``@pietroalbini``
..., r=jackh726
`IntoFuture::into_future` is no longer unstable
We don't need to gate the `IntoFuture::into_future` call in `.await` lowering anymore.
`@bors` rollup
Make `method-not-found-generic-arg-elision.rs` error message not path dependent
Every time I bless `tests/ui/methods/method-not-found-generic-arg-elision.rs`, I get some nonsense "type is too long" + "written to disk" that shows up and have to manually revert because the combination of my rustc repo path + the UI test directory hits the length limit for printing types spilling to disk (since this happens before UI test path sanitization).
The fact that we use a closure in this test doesn't have to do with the UI test, so just box the closure to make the type name smaller and not path dependent.
...ywiser
Nicer ICE for rust-lang#67981
Provides a slightly nicer ICE for rust-lang#67981, documenting the problem. A proper fix will be necessary before `#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]` can be stabilized.
The problem is that the design of the `"rust-call"` ABI is fundamentally not compatible with `unsized_fn_params`. `"rust-call"` functions need to collect their arguments into a tuple, but if the arguments are not `Sized`, said tuple is potentially not even a valid type—and if it is, it requires `alloca` to create.
`@rustbot` label +A-abi +A-codegen +F-unboxed_closures +F-unsized_fn_params
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-style Relevant to the style team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 27, 2023
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2023

📌 Commit 1f3f65b has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 27, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 1f3f65b with merge 9e2b697d5d8358deed0d6a8bacc1f5d6e1cacce2...

Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+

Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2023

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2023

📌 Commit 1f3f65b has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 1f3f65b with merge b2c2088aedab907704b249be66c845e6b724728f...

Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-elpwf8c branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-style Relevant to the style team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /