Hey, Thank you for your contribution.

After reviewing we notice that your PR doesn't follow our guidelines.
You can find them in CONTRIBUTING.md in the root of the repo. If you have any question or want to contest this decision please send a message in your PR explaining your position.

If no fix is provided within 7-10 days this PR will be closed without further notice

Which guidelines have I infringed so that I can do the changes.

The icon is the wrong size, and looking at them more i don't think the snippets fit the scope of the project, but let's get another opinion on that

I just correct the size of the image and some other things that could be taken as infringement.

Thank you for your contribution and for taking the time to submit these snippets! However, after reviewing your PR, I believe that the snippets you’ve provided don’t fully align with the scope of QuickSnip.

The primary focus of QuickSnip is on self-contained functions that perform a specific task or solve a problem in a concise and reusable way. Your snippets, while useful, seem to focus more on UI components (e.g., how to create a button or widget that performs an action on click). These types of snippets are more about UI implementation rather than standalone, reusable logic.

While we might need to close this PR, If you’d like to adapt your snippets to better fit the scope of QuickSnip, I’d be happy to review them again! For example, instead of focusing on how to create a button, you could create a snippet for a utility function that handles a common task related to buttons or widgets (e.g., debouncing a click event, toggling a state, etc.)

Do you think that explaining how provider works could be a good idea ?

Quicksnip doesn't work like a document, we don't explain how stuff works, we provide usefull snippets of code that people can use in their codebases

Alright then I close this pr.