Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Implement frameless static calls #16471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
iluuu1994 wants to merge 2 commits into php:master
base: master
Choose a base branch
Loading
from iluuu1994:frameless-static-calls

Conversation

Copy link
Member

@iluuu1994 iluuu1994 commented Oct 16, 2024
edited
Loading

The very synthetic _ZendTestClass::framelessStaticMethod() shows a significant improvement, iterated 100 000 000 times.

Before:
Benchmark 1: sapi/cli/php test.php
 Time (mean ± σ): 1.221 s ± 0.026 s [User: 1.215 s, System: 0.002 s]
 Range (min ... max): 1.188 s ... 1.252 s 10 runs
 
After:
Benchmark 1: sapi/cli/php test.php
 Time (mean ± σ): 878.3 ms ± 15.9 ms [User: 874.4 ms, System: 1.1 ms]
 Range (min ... max): 852.7 ms ... 900.3 ms 10 runs

Obviously, this difference will be more noticeable if the implementation is simple, as in this case. The difference for useful methods will be smaller.

otobio and ddevsr reacted with heart emoji javiereguiluz and medabkari reacted with rocket emoji
/* Update opline in case it got invalidated. */
zend_op_array *op_array = CG(active_op_array);
opline = &op_array->opcodes[init_opnum];
literal_dtor(&ZEND_OP1_LITERAL(opline));
Copy link
Member Author

@iluuu1994 iluuu1994 Oct 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I actually forgot that these operands may contain multiple literals... Optimally we could attempt to compile frameless calls before emitting any opcodes, but the loading of fbc currently uses lcname emitted by zend_set_class_name_op1, a bit annoying.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. It would be better to check for frame-less variant before emitting INIT_STATIC_METHOD_CALL
This may be done with the alternative following patch.
The only drawback is that zend_string_tolower() called twice times more.

diff --git a/Zend/zend_compile.c b/Zend/zend_compile.c
index 7e5351ddfaf..c479d97b27a 100644
--- a/Zend/zend_compile.c
+++ b/Zend/zend_compile.c
@@ -5329,6 +5329,47 @@ static void zend_compile_static_call(znode *result, zend_ast *ast, uint32_t type
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Check if we already know which method we're calling */
+	if (method_node.op_type == IS_CONST) {
+		zend_class_entry *ce = NULL;
+		if (class_node.op_type == IS_CONST) {
+			zend_string *lcname = zend_string_tolower(Z_STR(class_node.u.constant));
+			ce = zend_hash_find_ptr(CG(class_table), lcname);
+			if (ce) {
+				if (zend_compile_ignore_class(ce, CG(active_op_array)->filename)) {
+					ce = NULL;
+				}
+			} else if (CG(active_class_entry)
+					&& zend_string_equals_ci(CG(active_class_entry)->name, lcname)) {
+				ce = CG(active_class_entry);
+			}
+			zend_string_release(lcname);
+		} else if (class_node.op_type == IS_UNUSED
+				&& (class_node.u.op.num & ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_MASK) == ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_SELF
+				&& zend_is_scope_known()) {
+			ce = CG(active_class_entry);
+		}
+		if (ce) {
+			zend_string *lcname = zend_string_tolower(Z_STR(method_node.u.constant));
+			fbc = zend_get_compatible_func_or_null(ce, lcname);
+			zend_string_release(lcname);
+
+			if (fbc
+			 && !(CG(compiler_options) & ZEND_COMPILE_NO_BUILTINS)
+			 && (fbc->type == ZEND_INTERNAL_FUNCTION)
+			 && zend_ast_is_list(args_ast)
+			 && !zend_args_contain_unpack_or_named(zend_ast_get_list(args_ast))) {
+				if (zend_compile_frameless_icall(result, zend_ast_get_list(args_ast), fbc, type) != (uint32_t)-1) {
+					zval_ptr_dtor(&method_node.u.constant);
+					if (class_node.op_type == IS_CONST) {
+						zval_ptr_dtor(&class_node.u.constant);
+					}
+					return;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	opline = get_next_op();
 	opline->opcode = ZEND_INIT_STATIC_METHOD_CALL;
 
@@ -5346,31 +5387,6 @@ static void zend_compile_static_call(znode *result, zend_ast *ast, uint32_t type
 		SET_NODE(opline->op2, &method_node);
 	}
 
-	/* Check if we already know which method we're calling */
-	if (opline->op2_type == IS_CONST) {
-		zend_class_entry *ce = NULL;
-		if (opline->op1_type == IS_CONST) {
-			zend_string *lcname = Z_STR_P(CT_CONSTANT(opline->op1) + 1);
-			ce = zend_hash_find_ptr(CG(class_table), lcname);
-			if (ce) {
-				if (zend_compile_ignore_class(ce, CG(active_op_array)->filename)) {
-					ce = NULL;
-				}
-			} else if (CG(active_class_entry)
-					&& zend_string_equals_ci(CG(active_class_entry)->name, lcname)) {
-				ce = CG(active_class_entry);
-			}
-		} else if (opline->op1_type == IS_UNUSED
-				&& (opline->op1.num & ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_MASK) == ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_SELF
-				&& zend_is_scope_known()) {
-			ce = CG(active_class_entry);
-		}
-		if (ce) {
-			zend_string *lcname = Z_STR_P(CT_CONSTANT(opline->op2) + 1);
-			fbc = zend_get_compatible_func_or_null(ce, lcname);
-		}
-	}
-
 	zend_compile_call_common(result, args_ast, fbc, zend_ast_get_lineno(method_ast));
 }
 /* }}} */

Copy link
Member Author

@iluuu1994 iluuu1994 Nov 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! The code looks good to me and I pushed it. It makes reviewing slightly harder.

Copy link
Member Author

@dstogov Have you ever had time to check whether this makes a meaningful difference for your FFI case? In the synthetic benchmark, it shows a 29% improvement compared to normal static method calls.

Copy link
Member

dstogov commented Nov 25, 2024

Sorry, I missed this. I'll take a careful look and do benchmarks later this week.

iluuu1994 reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Member

@dstogov dstogov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the implementation.

Think about the alternative zend_compile.c patch.
I'm not sure what version is better.
May be lc_name(s) may be cached to avoid the double work or may be it's better to keep the sources clean (speed of compiler is not very important).

iluuu1994 reacted with thumbs up emoji
/* Update opline in case it got invalidated. */
zend_op_array *op_array = CG(active_op_array);
opline = &op_array->opcodes[init_opnum];
literal_dtor(&ZEND_OP1_LITERAL(opline));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. It would be better to check for frame-less variant before emitting INIT_STATIC_METHOD_CALL
This may be done with the alternative following patch.
The only drawback is that zend_string_tolower() called twice times more.

diff --git a/Zend/zend_compile.c b/Zend/zend_compile.c
index 7e5351ddfaf..c479d97b27a 100644
--- a/Zend/zend_compile.c
+++ b/Zend/zend_compile.c
@@ -5329,6 +5329,47 @@ static void zend_compile_static_call(znode *result, zend_ast *ast, uint32_t type
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Check if we already know which method we're calling */
+	if (method_node.op_type == IS_CONST) {
+		zend_class_entry *ce = NULL;
+		if (class_node.op_type == IS_CONST) {
+			zend_string *lcname = zend_string_tolower(Z_STR(class_node.u.constant));
+			ce = zend_hash_find_ptr(CG(class_table), lcname);
+			if (ce) {
+				if (zend_compile_ignore_class(ce, CG(active_op_array)->filename)) {
+					ce = NULL;
+				}
+			} else if (CG(active_class_entry)
+					&& zend_string_equals_ci(CG(active_class_entry)->name, lcname)) {
+				ce = CG(active_class_entry);
+			}
+			zend_string_release(lcname);
+		} else if (class_node.op_type == IS_UNUSED
+				&& (class_node.u.op.num & ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_MASK) == ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_SELF
+				&& zend_is_scope_known()) {
+			ce = CG(active_class_entry);
+		}
+		if (ce) {
+			zend_string *lcname = zend_string_tolower(Z_STR(method_node.u.constant));
+			fbc = zend_get_compatible_func_or_null(ce, lcname);
+			zend_string_release(lcname);
+
+			if (fbc
+			 && !(CG(compiler_options) & ZEND_COMPILE_NO_BUILTINS)
+			 && (fbc->type == ZEND_INTERNAL_FUNCTION)
+			 && zend_ast_is_list(args_ast)
+			 && !zend_args_contain_unpack_or_named(zend_ast_get_list(args_ast))) {
+				if (zend_compile_frameless_icall(result, zend_ast_get_list(args_ast), fbc, type) != (uint32_t)-1) {
+					zval_ptr_dtor(&method_node.u.constant);
+					if (class_node.op_type == IS_CONST) {
+						zval_ptr_dtor(&class_node.u.constant);
+					}
+					return;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	opline = get_next_op();
 	opline->opcode = ZEND_INIT_STATIC_METHOD_CALL;
 
@@ -5346,31 +5387,6 @@ static void zend_compile_static_call(znode *result, zend_ast *ast, uint32_t type
 		SET_NODE(opline->op2, &method_node);
 	}
 
-	/* Check if we already know which method we're calling */
-	if (opline->op2_type == IS_CONST) {
-		zend_class_entry *ce = NULL;
-		if (opline->op1_type == IS_CONST) {
-			zend_string *lcname = Z_STR_P(CT_CONSTANT(opline->op1) + 1);
-			ce = zend_hash_find_ptr(CG(class_table), lcname);
-			if (ce) {
-				if (zend_compile_ignore_class(ce, CG(active_op_array)->filename)) {
-					ce = NULL;
-				}
-			} else if (CG(active_class_entry)
-					&& zend_string_equals_ci(CG(active_class_entry)->name, lcname)) {
-				ce = CG(active_class_entry);
-			}
-		} else if (opline->op1_type == IS_UNUSED
-				&& (opline->op1.num & ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_MASK) == ZEND_FETCH_CLASS_SELF
-				&& zend_is_scope_known()) {
-			ce = CG(active_class_entry);
-		}
-		if (ce) {
-			zend_string *lcname = Z_STR_P(CT_CONSTANT(opline->op2) + 1);
-			fbc = zend_get_compatible_func_or_null(ce, lcname);
-		}
-	}
-
 	zend_compile_call_common(result, args_ast, fbc, zend_ast_get_lineno(method_ast));
 }
 /* }}} */

Copy link
Member Author

There is an issue on ARM (or possibly the configuration we're using for that build). I'll have a look at that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dstogov dstogov dstogov left review comments

@kocsismate kocsismate Awaiting requested review from kocsismate kocsismate will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review kocsismate is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /