Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

remove usage of the 'reduce...spread' pattern #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
schester44 wants to merge 1 commit into mattphillips:master from schester44:master

Conversation

Copy link

@schester44 schester44 commented Jul 1, 2019

This is a PR in response to #46 . It aims to improve the speed of the package by removing the usage of the 'reduce...spread' pattern, in favor of traditional for loops.

Benchmark.js stats

added#original x 533,358 ops/sec ±0.70% (92 runs sampled)
added#new x 1,114,933 ops/sec ±0.63% (94 runs sampled)

updated#original x 391,597 ops/sec ±0.97% (91 runs sampled)
updated#new x 1,057,258 ops/sec ±0.47% (95 runs sampled)

deleted#original x 1,299,890 ops/sec ±0.54% (94 runs sampled)
deleted#new x 1,981,737 ops/sec ±1.09% (90 runs sampled)

detailed#original x 203,221 ops/sec ±0.60% (93 runs sampled)
detailed#new x 357,716 ops/sec ±0.36% (85 runs sampled)

diff#original x 244,553 ops/sec ±0.50% (91 runs sampled)
diff#new x 855,466 ops/sec ±0.97% (92 runs sampled)

Reference https://www.richsnapp.com/blog/2019/06-09-reduce-spread-anti-pattern

anko, mjfwebb, popojargo, fratzinger, and cmawhorter reacted with thumbs up emoji
reduce usage of reduce spread pattern
1.1.1
remove reduce...spread pattern from added, updated, and deleted methods
remove the reduce...spread pattern for perf gains
reduce usage of reduce spread pattern
1.1.1
remove reduce...spread pattern from added, updated, and deleted methods
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e6dd6f1 on schester44:master into 6296889 on mattphillips:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /