Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Document JsonApiEndpoints enum #1301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
verdie-g wants to merge 9 commits into json-api-dotnet:master from verdie-g:document-json-api-endpoints-enum
Closed

Document JsonApiEndpoints enum #1301

verdie-g wants to merge 9 commits into json-api-dotnet:master from verdie-g:document-json-api-endpoints-enum

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

@verdie-g verdie-g commented Aug 20, 2023

Closes #1298

QUALITY CHECKLIST

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2023
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #1301 (d7962b7) into master (68e1854) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1301 +/- ##
=======================================
 Coverage 93.03% 93.03% 
=======================================
 Files 268 268 
 Lines 8795 8795 
=======================================
 Hits 8182 8182 
 Misses 613 613 

Copy link
Member

Thanks. I'll get back to this next month, after my break.

Copy link
Member

@bkoelman bkoelman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please note the line at the top of this file:

// IMPORTANT: An internal copy of this type exists in the SourceGenerators project. Keep these in sync when making changes.

These changes should be replicated in the other file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

verdie-g commented Sep 4, 2023

The CI error is weird, I did run cleanupcode 🤔

Copy link
Member

bkoelman commented Sep 4, 2023

The CI error is weird, I did run cleanupcode 🤔

Strange indeed. Running locally on Windows does not produce a diff. I haven't seen this happen before, will investigate. What OS are you using?

Copy link
Contributor Author

verdie-g commented Sep 4, 2023

Windows 11 and

$ dotnet --info
.NET SDK:
 Version: 7.0.400
 Commit: 73bf45718d
Runtime Environment:
 OS Name: Windows
 OS Version: 10.0.22621
 OS Platform: Windows
 RID: win10-x64
 Base Path: C:\Program Files\dotnet\sdk7円.0.400\
Host:
 Version: 7.0.10
 Architecture: x64
 Commit: a6dbb800a4
.NET SDKs installed:
 6.0.413 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\sdk]
 7.0.400 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\sdk]
.NET runtimes installed:
 Microsoft.AspNetCore.App 6.0.21 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
 Microsoft.AspNetCore.App 7.0.10 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
 Microsoft.NETCore.App 6.0.21 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.NETCore.App]
 Microsoft.NETCore.App 7.0.10 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.NETCore.App]
 Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App 6.0.21 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App]
 Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App 7.0.10 [C:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App]
Other architectures found:
 None
Environment variables:
 Not set
global.json file:
 Not found

Copy link
Contributor Author

verdie-g commented Sep 4, 2023

Could it be a line-ending thing? Maybe locally I'm using CRLF and the CI is using LF the number of characters on the line is different?

Copy link
Member

bkoelman commented Sep 7, 2023

Could it be a line-ending thing? Maybe locally I'm using CRLF and the CI is using LF the number of characters on the line is different?

Yes, but I don't think that should matter. It has always worked that way. I've created a temporary PR #1304 to investigate.

Copy link
Member

@verdie-g Sorry this is taking so long. I've opened a bug at https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-494002, but it hasn't been triaged yet.

Meanwhile, can you please merge or rebase on the latest changes in master? I've replaced AppVeyor with GitHub Actions. This is a nice opportunity to test whether everything works from a community PR. I can't do it myself because my account has write permissions and I'd like to confirm builds work without that. Sadly, it won't fix the cleanupcode bug though.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like it's failing for macos

Copy link
Member

Looks like it's failing for macos

Yes, same as linux.

@verdie-g verdie-g closed this by deleting the head repository Nov 9, 2023
Copy link
Member

bkoelman commented Nov 9, 2023
edited
Loading

@verdie-g I'd like to keep this PR open. I suspect this was closed unintentionally as a side effect of deleting your fork. I'm unable to reopen because your fork no longer exists. Can you restore it?

We still want to take this PR. The related issue has been triaged with priority critical, so I have high hopes a fix will become available soon.

Copy link
Contributor Author

verdie-g commented Nov 9, 2023

I completely forgot about that PR. I'll try restoring the fork when I get some time.

Copy link
Member

Superseded by #1423.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bkoelman bkoelman bkoelman requested changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JsonApiEndpoints documentation

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /