-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
Fix: Javascript's earlier names #3869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
vishal0902
wants to merge
1
commit into
javascript-tutorial:master
from
vishal0902:fix-js-earlier-names
Open
Fix: Javascript's earlier names #3869
vishal0902
wants to merge
1
commit into
javascript-tutorial:master
from
vishal0902:fix-js-earlier-names
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@javascript-translate-bot
javascript-translate-bot
added
the
review needed
Review needed, please approve or request changes
label
Aug 22, 2025
@javascript-translate-bot
javascript-translate-bot
requested review from
a team
August 22, 2025 05:25
CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.
Member
joaquinelio
commented
Aug 22, 2025
I don’t think this addition is useful for the header purpose.
The focus is "why JavaScript" and explained mentioning LiveScript as a previous name.
Mocha may be also confused with the framework explained later in the tutorial.
According to chatgpt, Mocha was an internal codename and never released under that name.
Author
vishal0902
commented
Aug 22, 2025
via email
Yes you said it right because the focus is on "why JavaScript".
Actually I read about this on Wikipedia when I was going through an article
about Brenda Rich, the creator of JavaScript. I read this in career
section. Here's the link -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich
By the way, javascript.info is the best resource I have ever found. Great
work.
... On 2025年8月22日, 20:14 joaquinelio, ***@***.***> wrote:
*joaquinelio* left a comment (javascript-tutorial/en.javascript.info#3869)
<#3869 (comment)>
I don’t think this addition is useful for the header purpose.
The focus is "why JavaScript" and explained mentioning LiveScript as a
previous name.
Mocha may be also confused with the framework explained later in the
tutorial.
According to chatgpt, Mocha was an internal codename and never released
under that name.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3869 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX3GOG3747TJX4F5J7HSC6D3O4UEXAVCNFSM6AAAAACEQ2DVD2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMJUGYZTANRTGU>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
Author
vishal0902
commented
Aug 22, 2025
via email
Yes you said it right because the focus is on "why JavaScript".
Actually I read about this on Wikipedia when I was going through an article
about Brendan Eich, the creator of JavaScript. I read this in career
section. Here's the link -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich
By the way, javascript.info is the best resource I have ever found. Great
work.
On 2025年8月22日, 20:26 Vishal Srivastava, ***@***.***>
wrote:
... Yes you said it right because the focus is on "why JavaScript".
Actually I read about this on Wikipedia when I was going through an
article about Brenda Rich, the creator of JavaScript. I read this in career
section. Here's the link -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich
By the way, javascript.info is the best resource I have ever found. Great
work.
On 2025年8月22日, 20:14 joaquinelio, ***@***.***> wrote:
> *joaquinelio* left a comment
> (javascript-tutorial/en.javascript.info#3869)
> <#3869 (comment)>
>
> I don’t think this addition is useful for the header purpose.
> The focus is "why JavaScript" and explained mentioning LiveScript as a
> previous name.
> Mocha may be also confused with the framework explained later in the
> tutorial.
>
> According to chatgpt, Mocha was an internal codename and never released
> under that name.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#3869 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX3GOG3747TJX4F5J7HSC6D3O4UEXAVCNFSM6AAAAACEQ2DVD2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMJUGYZTANRTGU>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Initially, Javscript was called "Mocha", then changed to "LiveScript" before finally being named JavaScript.