Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Comments

Platform Doors#613

Draft
georgevicbell wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:master from
georgevicbell:platformdoors
Draft

Platform Doors #613
georgevicbell wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:master from
georgevicbell:platformdoors

Conversation

@georgevicbell
Copy link

@georgevicbell georgevicbell commented Feb 16, 2026
edited
Loading

Summary

Adds an optional stop_doors field to stops.txt with the following values:
0 - No doors installed
1 - Full Height Doors or Screen
2 - 3/4 Height Doors or Screen
3 - Half Height Doors or Screen
4 - Full Height Fence or Panel
5 - 3/4 Height Doors or Screen
6 - Half Height Doors or Screen
7 - Under Construction
8 - Partially Out of Order
9 - Completely Out of Order

Describe the Problem

Resolves #612

Include whether a stop is protected with full, 3/4, 1/2 height platform doors. This could apply to subway, LRT, or even bus stops (many examples). We also see on some systems the use of static platform fences or panels - again 1/2, 3/4 or full height.

Practically this provides information for parents, users with accessibility needs or those who are anxious about platform safety.

In some stations individual platforms may vary as to the level of protection or platform design.

Use Cases

  • Information for users, apps (for example an app that helps folks with mental health issues navigate a transit system safely may be able to prioritize alternate stations or routes to ensure safer travel)
  • Allow for analysis of different systems and stations
  • Track the ongoing construction and status of platform doors (this is similar to elevators, escalators etc.)

Type of change

GTFS Schedule

  • Functional Change
  • Non-Functional Change
  • Documentation Maintenance

GTFS Realtime

  • Specification Change
  • Specification Change (Experimental Field)

Additional Information

I run a website - platformdoors.info - it is currently very difficult to determine if individual platforms at stations have platform doors, whether they are working, or what style they are. I had thought GTFS would have had this information but it appears it doesn't.

Proposed Discussion Period

I think 1 month of discussion would make sense, but am open to whatever the community believes is reasonable.

Testing Details

Proposal Update Tracker

Date Update Description
(2026年02月16日) PR Created in Draft

Checklist

Copy link
Contributor

gcamp commented Feb 16, 2026

It make more sense to me to have this information in something like stop amenities than one-more-field approach that's suggested here.

georgevicbell and jfabi reacted with thumbs up emoji

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Proposal: Platform Screen Doors, Platform Fences, No Barriers

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /