Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Paper Main Framework

Brieuc de La Fournière edited this page Mar 12, 2026 · 2 revisions

Paper: Main Framework

Geometric Information Field Theory: Topological Derivation of Standard Model Parameters from G2 Holonomy Manifolds

Brieuc de La Fournière (2026) Full text (markdown) | Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18837071


Abstract

Framework proposing that 19 Standard Model dimensionless parameters emerge as topological invariants of a 7D G2 holonomy manifold K7 with Betti numbers (b2=21, b3=77) coupled to ×ばつE8 gauge structure. Derives 33 dimensionless predictions with mean deviation 0.24% from experiment. 18 core relations formally verified in Lean 4. DUNE will test δ_CP = 197° falsification criterion.


Key Results

Observable GIFT Formula Value Exp. Dev.
sin2θ_W b2/(b3+dim(G2)) 3/13 0.2312 0.19%
N_gen rank(E8)−Weyl 3 3 exact
Q_Koide dim(G2)/b2 2/3 0.6667 0.001%
α_s(M_Z) √2/12 0.1179 0.1179 0.04%
δ_CP ×ばつ14+99 197° 177°±20°
m_τ/m_e ×ばつ99 3477 3477.2 0.004%
n_s ζ(11)/ζ(5) 0.9649 0.9649 0.004%

Global: 33 predictions, 0.24% mean deviation (32 well-measured), 4 exact, 28/33 sub-1%


Section Structure

  1. Introduction — Parameter problem, contemporary context, framework overview
  2. Mathematical Framework — Octonions, ×ばつE8, K7 hypothesis, G2 structure
  3. Methodology & Epistemic Status — Derivation principle, claims vs non-claims
  4. Derivation of 33 Predictions — Gauge, lepton, quark, neutrino, Higgs, cosmological sectors
  5. Formal Verification & Statistics — Lean 4 (290+ theorems), uniqueness among 192,349 alternatives
  6. G2 Metric Program — PINN atlas construction, metric quality results
  7. Falsifiable Predictions — δ_CP via DUNE, fourth generation bounds
  8. Discussion — M-theory connections, comparison with other approaches, limitations
  9. Conclusion

Statistical Validation

  • (21,77) unique optimal among 192,349 configurations (p < ×ばつ10−6)
  • ×ばつE8 achieves ×ばつ better agreement than next best gauge group
  • G2 holonomy achieves ×ばつ better than Calabi-Yau (SU(3))
  • Lean 4 verification: 290+ theorems, 0 sorry, 0 domain-specific axioms

Related

Clone this wiki locally

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /