Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Sign up

Climbmix Agent Run Mar 19 2026

Dave Graham edited this page Mar 20, 2026 · 1 revision

Climbmix Agent Run — Mar 19, 2026 (M5 Max)

Overview

Autonomous agent run on climbmix-400b-shuffle (Karpathy's default web crawl dataset) using the headless experiment runner. The agent ran 101 experiments over ~9 hours but found the configuration near-optimal — only 1 experiment was kept, improving val_bpb by just 0.08%.

This run started from an already partially-optimized baseline (AR=32, MATRIX_LR=0.0435) inherited from prior runs on the same branch, which explains the exceptionally tight margin for improvement.

Results Chart

Climbmix Agent Run — Mar 19, 2026

Hardware

Spec Value
Chip Apple M5 Max
Unified Memory 64 GB
GPU Cores 40
Backend MLX
Time Budget 5 minutes per experiment

Summary Statistics

Metric Value
Total Experiments 101 (exp0–exp100)
Kept 1 (1.0%)
Discarded 89 (88.1%)
Crashed 11 (10.9%)
Best val_bpb 1.2959 (exp84)
Baseline val_bpb 1.2969 (exp0)
Total Improvement −0.0011 (0.08%)
LLM Backend Claude Sonnet

Starting Configuration (Baseline)

The baseline inherited optimizations from prior runs on this branch:

ASPECT_RATIO = 32 # ↓ from 64 (prior optimization)
MATRIX_LR = 0.0435 # ↑ from 0.04 (prior optimization)
WEIGHT_DECAY = 0.2 # Default
WARMDOWN_RATIO = 0.5 # Default
EMBEDDING_LR = 0.6 # Default
UNEMBEDDING_LR = 0.004 # Default
SCALAR_LR = 0.5 # Default
ADAM_BETAS = (0.8, 0.95) # Default

Kept Experiment

Only one experiment improved on the baseline:

Exp val_bpb Delta Description
exp0 1.2969 Baseline (AR=32, MATRIX_LR=0.0435)
exp84 1.2959 −0.0011 UNEMBEDDING_LR 0.004 → 0.0041

Analysis

Near-Optimal Configuration

The 0.08% improvement across 101 experiments is the smallest gain in any agent run to date. This indicates the starting configuration was already close to the local optimum for climbmix data on this hardware. For comparison:

Run Dataset Improvement Experiments Keep Rate
Mar 16 Climbmix (from defaults) −1.3% 81 11.1%
Mar 17 FineWeb-Edu −8.1% 101 18.8%
Mar 19 Climbmix (pre-optimized) −0.08% 101 1.0%

Crash Analysis

11 experiments crashed (10.9% crash rate) — all from batch size modifications:

Crashed Experiments Parameter Values Attempted
exp6, exp12 TOTAL_BATCH_SIZE Reductions
exp34, exp35, exp37, exp41, exp42, exp47, exp55, exp63, exp66 DEVICE_BATCH_SIZE 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15

The agent repeatedly tried DEVICE_BATCH_SIZE changes (9 attempts) despite consistent crashes. Only the default batch size (and small reductions to 1–4) avoided crashing. This suggests the MLX backend has strict alignment requirements for batch dimensions.

What the Agent Tried

The agent explored nearly every parameter category without finding improvements:

Category Experiments Result
Batch Size 22 11 crashes, 11 discards
Architecture (AR, DEPTH, WINDOW) 13 All discards
Matrix LR 12 All discards
Unembedding LR 11 1 keep (exp84)
Embedding LR 10 All discards
Weight Decay 8 All discards
Scalar LR 7 All discards
Warmdown/Warmup 5 All discards
Adam Betas 5 All discards
Other 7 All discards

val_bpb Distribution

The distribution chart shows most experiments clustered between 1.30–1.33, with the baseline and best nearly overlapping. No experiment came close to the baseline other than exp84, confirming the parameter space around this configuration is a plateau.

Branch

  • Branch: autoresearch/mar19-climbmix
  • Agent: Claude Sonnet (headless runner)
  • Date: March 19, 2026

Clone this wiki locally

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /