Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Allow type field on none polymorphic serializers #376

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mblayman merged 1 commit into django-json-api:develop from sliverc:type_field_name
Nov 28, 2017

Conversation

Copy link
Member

@sliverc sliverc commented Oct 11, 2017

Changes in #211 caused serializers with type field to fail, breaking backwards compatibility. This change fixes this by allowing type fields again on none polymorphic serializers.

Copy link
Member Author

sliverc commented Oct 11, 2017
edited
Loading

(削除) For CI to run integrated #373 (削除ここまで) updated to current develop branch.

Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 12, 2017
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #376 into develop will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #376 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 93.05% 93.07% +0.01% 
===========================================
 Files 51 52 +1 
 Lines 2665 2686 +21 
===========================================
+ Hits 2480 2500 +20 
- Misses 185 186 +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
setup.py 80% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
example/views.py 90.74% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
example/tests/conftest.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
rest_framework_json_api/parsers.py 97.14% <100%> (+0.17%) ⬆️
example/tests/test_model_viewsets.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
example/tests/test_performance.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
example/migrations/0004_auto_20171011_0631.py 100% <100%> (ø)
example/serializers.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
example/factories.py 97.1% <100%> (+0.22%) ⬆️
rest_framework_json_api/serializers.py 84.05% <0%> (-0.73%) ⬇️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7b8e38e...f4aab7f. Read the comment docs.

@sliverc sliverc mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2017
Copy link
Collaborator

@sliverc, thanks for going through all that extra effort for a relatively small change. 👍

@mblayman mblayman merged commit 9fa2e23 into django-json-api:develop Nov 28, 2017
sliverc added a commit to sliverc/django-rest-framework-json-api that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2021
This support was added in django-json-api#376 but only for non polymorphic fields.
However as per specification [0] `type` must not be a field name and
therefore must be forbidden in DJA as well.
Some dependents might depend on being allowed to have a field
name `type` so deprecating it now and remove it in next major version.
[0] https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-object-fields 
sliverc added a commit to sliverc/django-rest-framework-json-api that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2021
This support was added in django-json-api#376 but only for non polymorphic fields.
However as per specification [0] `type` must not be a field name and
therefore must be forbidden in DJA as well.
Some dependents might depend on being allowed to have a field
name `type` so deprecating it now and remove it in next major version.
[0] https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-object-fields 
n2ygk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2021
This support was added in #376 but only for non polymorphic fields.
However as per specification [0] `type` must not be a field name and
therefore must be forbidden in DJA as well.
Some dependents might depend on being allowed to have a field
name `type` so deprecating it now and remove it in next major version.
[0] https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-object-fields 
@sliverc sliverc deleted the type_field_name branch December 28, 2021 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /