-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
docs: add Why not CalVer to FAQ #476
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #476 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.04% 98.04% ======================================= Files 39 39 Lines 1431 1431 ======================================= Hits 1403 1403 Misses 28 28
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Many thanks for updating the docs 🎉 @woile Let's know if you'd like to add more content. If no further comments, I'd like to merge it tomorrow
Addresses: #173
Add explanation for why the issue and PR for CalVer were closed
Please feel free to add comments or edit directly! I would be happy to make this more clear