Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

refactor(questions): type questions with TypedDict #1485

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into commitizen-tools:refactors from bearomorphism:typed-questions
Jun 8, 2025

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

@bearomorphism bearomorphism commented May 31, 2025
edited
Loading

Description

A better version of #1467

Make the type of questions more strict. Not sure whether we should deprecate the type Questions.

Checklist

Code Changes

  • Add test cases to all the changes you introduce
  • Run poetry all locally to ensure this change passes linter check and tests
  • Manually test the changes:
    • Verify the feature/bug fix works as expected in real-world scenarios
    • Test edge cases and error conditions
    • Ensure backward compatibility is maintained
    • Document any manual testing steps performed
  • Update the documentation for the changes

Documentation Changes

  • Run poetry doc locally to ensure the documentation pages renders correctly
    • Check if there are any broken links in the documentation

When running poetry doc, any broken internal documentation links will be reported in the console output like this:

INFO - Doc file 'config.md' contains a link 'commands/bump.md#-post_bump_hooks', but the doc 'commands/bump.md' does not contain an anchor '#-post_bump_hooks'.

Expected Behavior

Steps to Test This Pull Request

Additional Context

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 31, 2025
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.88%. Comparing base (a9cd957) to head (f18342b).
Report is 7 commits behind head on refactors.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## refactors #1485 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 97.87% 97.88% +0.01% 
=============================================
 Files 57 58 +1 
 Lines 2677 2700 +23 
=============================================
+ Hits 2620 2643 +23 
 Misses 57 57 
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.88% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.


# Type
Questions = Iterable[MutableMapping[str, Any]]
Questions = Iterable[MutableMapping[str, Any]]# TODO: deprecate this?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds good

Copy link
Member

@Lee-W Lee-W left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly good; respond to one of your questions. Let me know if you want to address it in this PR or the next. Thanks!

@Lee-W Lee-W added pr-status: ready-to-merge almost ready to merge. just keep it for a few days for others to check and removed pr-status: wait-for-review labels Jun 8, 2025
@Lee-W Lee-W force-pushed the refactors branch 2 times, most recently from baee83e to a9cd957 Compare June 8, 2025 13:31
@Lee-W Lee-W merged commit 626e67c into commitizen-tools:refactors Jun 8, 2025
18 checks passed
@bearomorphism bearomorphism deleted the typed-questions branch June 13, 2025 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Lee-W Lee-W Lee-W approved these changes

@woile woile Awaiting requested review from woile

@noirbizarre noirbizarre Awaiting requested review from noirbizarre

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
pr-status: ready-to-merge almost ready to merge. just keep it for a few days for others to check pr-status: wait-for-review type: refactor
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /