-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Eslint showcase #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eslint showcase #12
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new ESLint configuration file, a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TestComponent
participant OkComponent
User->>TestComponent: Render
TestComponent->>createMarkup: Call to generate HTML
TestComponent-->>User: Returns div with dangerouslySetInnerHTML
User->>OkComponent: Render
OkComponent-->>User: Returns object with __html property
Poem
Impact AnalysisNew React components with potential XSS risk📢 Medium 🔒Impacts security Two React components, TestComponent and OkComponent, were added. TestComponent uses dangerouslySetInnerHTML with unverified output from createMarkup(), posing a potential cross-site scripting vulnerability, while OkComponent renders static, encoded HTML safely. Audit TestComponent’s use of dangerouslySetInnerHTML: ensure createMarkup() output is sanitized or switch to safer rendering methods. Validate that OkComponent’s static HTML remains properly encoded. Write unit and integration tests to simulate malicious HTML input via createMarkup() and verify it is not rendered. Confirm both components render expected content without exposing XSS vectors. 🔍 Related Files
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@coderabbitai full review
✅ Actions performed
Full review triggered.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitai
bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
eslint/test.js (2)
1-1: Add missing semicolon for consistent coding style.Consider adding a semicolon at the end of the statement for better consistency and to avoid potential ESLint warnings.
-const foo = 42 +const foo = 42;
3-3: Add missing semicolon for consistent coding style.Add a semicolon at the end of the statement for better consistency.
-console.log("Hello World") +console.log("Hello World");
eslint/test.js
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use strict equality instead of loose equality.
Replace the loose equality operator (==) with strict equality (===) to avoid unexpected type coercion behavior. This prevents potential bugs and aligns with JavaScript best practices.
-if (foo == "42") { - console.log("Loose equality!") +if (foo === 42) { + console.log("Strict equality!"); +}
Alternatively, if you specifically need to compare with a string, convert the number to string:
-if (foo == "42") { - console.log("Loose equality!") +if (foo.toString() === "42") { + console.log("String comparison!"); +}
Also add a semicolon after the console.log statement:
- console.log("Loose equality!") + console.log("Loose equality!");
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In eslint/test.js around lines 4 to 6, replace the loose equality operator (==)
with the strict equality operator (===) to prevent type coercion issues. Also,
add a semicolon after the console.log statement to follow JavaScript syntax best
practices.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary by CodeRabbit