Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Sign up
Appearance settings

Consider flexible tags as for detached volume migration #12453

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
Pearl1594 wants to merge 3 commits into 4.20
base: 4.20
Choose a base branch
Loading
from ghi10021-flexibletags-detachedvolmigration

Conversation

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 commented Jan 16, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Description

This PR #10021

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 51 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 16.23%. Comparing base (f1f779a) to head (89d66a1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on 4.20.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...in/java/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java 0.00% 51 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #12453 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.23% 16.23% -0.01% 
 Complexity 13381 13381 
============================================
 Files 5657 5657 
 Lines 499024 499322 +298 
 Branches 60562 60703 +141 
============================================
+ Hits 81029 81077 +48 
- Misses 408959 409204 +245 
- Partials 9036 9041 +5
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.00% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
unittests 17.09% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 40%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@abh1sar abh1sar added this to the 4.20.3 milestone Feb 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@JoaoJandre JoaoJandre Awaiting requested review from JoaoJandre

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

4.20.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /